2014
DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.150787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia: A clinical entity mistaken for squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,7,8 Limitation of incision biopsy should be uppermost in the mind of the clinician and the need for a repeat deeper biopsy to include multiple sites (central areas and the margins the) down to the subcutaneous tissue before a definitive diagnosis is made, is essential whenever there is a clinico-pathologic discrepancy. 9,10 This happened to be the case with the index patient. A careful search for a possible ongoing infective process should be done with examination of deeper levels and use of microbiological special stains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5,7,8 Limitation of incision biopsy should be uppermost in the mind of the clinician and the need for a repeat deeper biopsy to include multiple sites (central areas and the margins the) down to the subcutaneous tissue before a definitive diagnosis is made, is essential whenever there is a clinico-pathologic discrepancy. 9,10 This happened to be the case with the index patient. A careful search for a possible ongoing infective process should be done with examination of deeper levels and use of microbiological special stains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PEH may be primary (e.g., primal gingival PEH) or secondary (e.g., granular cell tumor or chronic irritation). [1] It can be a result of various conditions such as infections, inflammation, trauma, and malignancy and is also referred to as pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia. Usually, PEH appears as a well-demarcated plaque or nodule with scaling and crusting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benign nature of PEH means that most cases are resolved by means of excision biopsy, although grafts or flaps are occasionally needed to reconstruct major tissue defects [ 3 , 5 , 6 ]. On occasions, due to the different underlying causes, a biopsy is not sufficient, and etiological treatment is required, depending on each of the pathologies mentioned in the introduction [ 1 – 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%