2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00649.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudo History/Weird History: Nationalism and the Internet

Abstract: One of the most important developments in the production of history in the early twenty‐first century has been the capacity of ‘weird history’ or ‘pseudo history’ to have a large impact on the public sphere. Pseudo history mimics professional history in the way that it presents itself to the public but its arguments defy any reasonable assessment of the evidence. In this paper, we examine the phenomenon of pseudo history through a consideration of its origins in travellers’ tales and its current manifestation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as we can see, this polarisation in favour of the Chinese will be something that Menzies delves into, thus building a version of the past that fits, in the epic and moral dimensions, with the interests and the economic importance of today's China. As Melleuish, Sheiko andBrown (2009, p. 1492) indicate, this country needs "the world to have a much larger view of its roles in shaping world history", so it is not surprising that, despite the scientific evidence against, the Chinese Communist Party supported Menzies's book (Goodman, 2006, p. 212), and that its promotion was supported from the beginning by the Chinese government (Steele, 2005, p. 278). Richardson (2008, p. 34) As we see, the political, propaganda, economic and commercial dimensions are closely intertwined in the historiographic battle, and "China's growing economic, strategic and even cultural roles have not been oblivious to the rewriting of its past, which has come to arouse certain Sinocentric exaggeration" (Taboada, 2007, p. 761).…”
Section: Gavin Menzies and His Version Of The First Voyage Around Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as we can see, this polarisation in favour of the Chinese will be something that Menzies delves into, thus building a version of the past that fits, in the epic and moral dimensions, with the interests and the economic importance of today's China. As Melleuish, Sheiko andBrown (2009, p. 1492) indicate, this country needs "the world to have a much larger view of its roles in shaping world history", so it is not surprising that, despite the scientific evidence against, the Chinese Communist Party supported Menzies's book (Goodman, 2006, p. 212), and that its promotion was supported from the beginning by the Chinese government (Steele, 2005, p. 278). Richardson (2008, p. 34) As we see, the political, propaganda, economic and commercial dimensions are closely intertwined in the historiographic battle, and "China's growing economic, strategic and even cultural roles have not been oblivious to the rewriting of its past, which has come to arouse certain Sinocentric exaggeration" (Taboada, 2007, p. 761).…”
Section: Gavin Menzies and His Version Of The First Voyage Around Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pero, como vemos, esta polarización a favor de los chinos será algo en lo que Menzies ahondará, construyendo así una versión del pasado que encajará, en lo épico y también en lo moral, con los intereses y la importancia económica de la China del presente. Esta necesita "que el mundo tenga una opinión mucho mayor de sus roles en la configuración de la historia mundial", dirán Melleuish, Sheiko & Brown (2009, p. 1492, por lo que no es de extrañar que, a pesar de las evidencias científicas en contra, el propio Partido Comunista Chino respaldara el libro de Menzies (Goodman, 2006, p. 212), y que su promoción fuera apoyada desde el inicio por el gobierno chino (Steele, 2005, p. 278). Cuenta Richardson (2008, p. 34) cómo el presidente de China llegó a defender la tesis del libro relativa a que China había descubierto Australia en el siglo XV, ante el propio Parlamento Australiano un 24 de octubre de 2003.…”
Section: Gavin Menzies Y Su Versión De La Primera Vuelta Al Mundounclassified
“…La obra de Menzies ejemplifica de manera canónica cómo incluso una verdad histórica sin sombra de duda puede verse acechada por ataques de desinformación y cuestionada por una verdad alternativa, pseudohistórica. Como afirman Melleuish, Sheiko & Brown (2009, p. 1485, los pseudohistoriadores, o escritores de Weird History, como también la llaman los autores, consideran que lo que están haciendo es escribir una historia que "corrige" los supuestos errores de los historiadores profesionales, quienes dominan el ámbito, pero están atrapados por las limitaciones metodológicas, académicas, etc.…”
Section: Pseudohistoria Y Posverdadunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations