2015
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudo‐dynamic testing of a concrete gravity dam

Abstract: Summary Inspired from the simplified single degree of freedom modeling approach used in the preliminary design of concrete gravity dams, a pseudo‐dynamic testing method was devised for the seismic testing of a concrete gravity dam section. The test specimen was a 1/75 scaled section of the 120‐m‐high monolith of the Melen Dam, one of the highest concrete gravity dams to be built in Turkey. The single degree of freedom idealization of the dam section was validated in the first stage of the study using numerical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(60 reference statements)
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 1/75 scaled model of the 120‐m‐high Melen Dam (Figure a) was tested using three different scaled ground motions by using the pseudo‐dynamic testing technique by Aldemir et al The original setup enabled the use of only the bottom half of the dam section and the inertial and hydrodynamic load effects were simulated using a lateral hydraulic piston. The overlapping lattice model was constructed by using a 25‐mm grid size to observe performance estimation for an un‐RC structural continuum.…”
Section: Validation Of the Overlapping Lattice Model With Structural mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1/75 scaled model of the 120‐m‐high Melen Dam (Figure a) was tested using three different scaled ground motions by using the pseudo‐dynamic testing technique by Aldemir et al The original setup enabled the use of only the bottom half of the dam section and the inertial and hydrodynamic load effects were simulated using a lateral hydraulic piston. The overlapping lattice model was constructed by using a 25‐mm grid size to observe performance estimation for an un‐RC structural continuum.…”
Section: Validation Of the Overlapping Lattice Model With Structural mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1/75 scaled model of the 120‐m‐high Melen Dam (Figure a) was tested using three different scaled ground motions in a pseudo‐dynamic setup . The special setup of the test enabled the use of only the bottom half of the dam section; the inertial and hydrodynamic load effects were simulated using a special loading apparatus.…”
Section: Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, PGA is the peak ground acceleration of the motion in cm/s 2 and S v,mean is the mean spectral velocity ranging from T 1 (5%) to 1.3 T 1 (5%) in cm/s. The estimate of the period as such for a damaged monolith was determined to yield better prediction results in parallel with the observations from testing . While undergoing damage, the cracks on the system open and close in the downstream and upstream directions instantaneously changing the frequency of the system.…”
Section: Nonlinear Behavior Of Concrete Monoliths During Seismic Excimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghaemmaghami and Ghaemian 3 studied the dynamic cracking of a small-scale model of a concrete buttress dam on a shaking table. Aldemir et al 4 devised a seismic pseudo-dynamic testing method for a small-scale model of a concrete gravity dam. Phansri et al 5 discussed the shaking table tests for small-scale models of a concrete gravity dam to simulate the propagation mode of seismic cracks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%