Pseudo-Contamination and Memory: Is There a Memory Advantage for Objects Touched by “Morphologically Deviant People”?

Abstract

Memory plays an important role in the behavioral immune system (BIS; Schaller in Psychological Inquiry , 17 (2), 96–101, 2016a ), a proactive immune system whose ultimate function is to make organisms avoid sources of contamination. Indeed, it has been found that objects presented next to sick people are remembered better than objects shown next to healthy people—representing a contamination effect in memory. In the present studies, we investigated this memory effect in relation to “pseudo-contaminated” sources, that is to say, people exhibiting cues ultimately evoking the threat of contamination but objectively posing no such threat in terms of disease transmission. Common objects were shown next to photographs of people having three kinds of morphological deviations—obesity (study 1), scars and burns (study 2), strange eyes (study 3)—or no morphological deviation. Contrary to our expectations, we found that “pseudo-contaminated objects” were not remembered better than “non-contaminated objects,” whereas discomfort ratings of the idea of touching the same objects were clearly higher with morphologically deviant people. Memory mechanisms do not seem to be mobilized by “pseudo-contamination” sources which are not directly related to infection risk.

A behavioural immune system perspective on disgust and social prejudice

“…In addition, measures of explicit prejudice are vulnerable to bias from social desirability (demand effects). Thus, the relation between pathogen avoidance and prejudice could be studied with methods that are less vulnerable to such biases, such as tasks that measure the memory processes involved in encoding and retrieving information relevant to estimating infection risk 124,144,145 .…”