1999
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-99-04731-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms with quadratic expansion

Abstract: Abstract. We show that if f : M → M is a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism on an orientable surface with oriented unstable manifolds and a quadratic expanding factor, then there is a hyperbolic toral automorphism on T 2 and a map h : M → T 2 such that h is a semi-conjugacy and (M, h) is a branched covering space of T 2 . We also give another characterization of pseudo-Anosov homeomorphisms with quadratic expansion in terms of the kinds of Euclidean foliations they admit which are compatible with the affine structure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [2], Arnoux and Fathi give an example of a pseudo-Anosov diffeomorphism f with orientable foliations on a surface of genus 3 whose dilatation coefficient is algebraic of degree 4 and such that f does not factor via a branched covering to a pseudo-Anosov map with irreducible action on its rational homology §. A similar example is impossible for λ that is a quadratic irrationality; indeed, we recover the result (Theorem 2.3) from [7]. Proof.…”
Section: Proof Of Corollary 3 From Theoremsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In [2], Arnoux and Fathi give an example of a pseudo-Anosov diffeomorphism f with orientable foliations on a surface of genus 3 whose dilatation coefficient is algebraic of degree 4 and such that f does not factor via a branched covering to a pseudo-Anosov map with irreducible action on its rational homology §. A similar example is impossible for λ that is a quadratic irrationality; indeed, we recover the result (Theorem 2.3) from [7]. Proof.…”
Section: Proof Of Corollary 3 From Theoremsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The existence of β 1 also follows from Franks and Rykken [FR99], who show that β 1 is always a branched cover with branch points and their images singularities. Thus β 1 is smooth at all but finitely many points and the preimages β 1 −1 (x) are finite sets with a uniformly bounded cardinality.…”
Section: Connections To Other Standard Measures and Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The semiconjugacy β 1 is a branched cover by [20] and so is locally a diffeomorphism at all but finitely many points and point inverses are finite sets. On the other hand, using the results above the semiconjugacy β 2 is Hölder exponent ν = log(µ)/ log(λ), but no larger ν.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%