The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.2478/aupcsm-2018-0008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pseudo-amenability and pseudo-contractibility of restricted semigroup algebra

Abstract: In this article the pseudo-amenability and pseudo-contractibility of restricted semigroup algebra $l_r^1(S)$ and semigroup algebra, l1(Sr) on restricted semigroup, Sr are investigated for different classes of inverse semi-groups such as Brandt semigroup, and Clifford semigroup. We particularly show the equivalence between pseudo-amenability and character amenability of restricted semigroup algebra on a Clifford semigroup and semigroup algebra on a restricted semigroup. Moreover, we show that when S = M0(… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of the above discussion, [11,Propositon 4.10] can not be valid. In other words, when 1 (S) is pseudo-amenable, then by [11,Proposition 3.5], S is amenable (not finite) and in general case, amenability of S does not imply amenability or character amenability of 1 (S). This happen when, S is an abelian or left (right) cancellative unital semigroup.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In light of the above discussion, [11,Propositon 4.10] can not be valid. In other words, when 1 (S) is pseudo-amenable, then by [11,Proposition 3.5], S is amenable (not finite) and in general case, amenability of S does not imply amenability or character amenability of 1 (S). This happen when, S is an abelian or left (right) cancellative unital semigroup.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since N ∧ and N ∨ are inverse semigroups, by Theorem 3, N ∧ and N ∨ must be finite which is impossible. It is shown in the proof of [11,Proposition 3.5] that every amenable inverse semigroup is finite which is not true. For instance, every bicyclic inverse semigroup is amenable but not finite and hence one side of the mentioned proposition is not true.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation