2021
DOI: 10.1111/and.13916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PSA nadir and time to PSA nadir during initial androgen deprivation therapy as prognostic factors in metastatic castration‐resistance prostate cancer patients treated with docetaxel

Abstract: Prostate‐specific antigen nadir (nPSA) and time to nPSA (TTN) have been proved to be associated with the prognosis of prostate cancer. In this study, we explored the prognosis effect of nPSA and TTN during initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after treatment with docetaxel‐based chemotherapy. The data of 153 mCRPC patients received docetaxel followed by ADT were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present multicenter retrospective case review approach revealed a significant association between nPSA levels < 0.2 ng/mL of nPSA and better median bPFS outcomes, relative to patients with nPSA levels ≥ 0.2 ng/mL of nPSA(27.6 vs 13.5 months, respectively), with these patients showing an overall 67.7% lower progression risk (HR, 0.323). Other studies have similarly reported lower nPSA levels to be related to a better prognosis (9,22), although the actual cut-off values for nPSA have varied among studies (8,9,(22)(23)(24). Several studies have used a cut-off value of 0.2 ng/mL (8,23,25), although some reports suggest that an undetectable nPSA level is related to better prognostic outcomes (26) and other reports have used a higher cut-off of 4.0 ng/mL (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present multicenter retrospective case review approach revealed a significant association between nPSA levels < 0.2 ng/mL of nPSA and better median bPFS outcomes, relative to patients with nPSA levels ≥ 0.2 ng/mL of nPSA(27.6 vs 13.5 months, respectively), with these patients showing an overall 67.7% lower progression risk (HR, 0.323). Other studies have similarly reported lower nPSA levels to be related to a better prognosis (9,22), although the actual cut-off values for nPSA have varied among studies (8,9,(22)(23)(24). Several studies have used a cut-off value of 0.2 ng/mL (8,23,25), although some reports suggest that an undetectable nPSA level is related to better prognostic outcomes (26) and other reports have used a higher cut-off of 4.0 ng/mL (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the initiation of ADT in patients with prostate cancer, the PSA levels undergo dynamic changes and monitoring these changes can provide insight into the patient outcomes. However, the actual prognostic value of parameters such as the nadir PSA (nPSA) and time to nPSA (TTN) levels remains the subject of substantial debate and further clinical analyses will be critical to fully clarify the relevance of these variables in different patient cohorts (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of the posttreatment PSA (higher PSA nadir or shorter time to PSA nadir) in predicting the progression to CRPC or the overall survival has been demonstrated in many reports. 13 , 22 - 26 However, the exact mechanism remains unclear. The possible reason is that the rapid decrease in the PSA level after ADT is due to the suppression of the expression of PSA mediated by the androgen receptor in hormone-sensitive prostate cancer cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar ndings have been con rmed in previous studies, [6,10] in which the lower the PSA nadir, the better the prognosis; however, the nadir cut-off values reported in different studies vary slightly. [5,6,10−13] Most studies concluded a cut-off value of 0.2 ng/ml, [5,10,11,13] and some suggest that PSA nadir should be as low as unmeasurable so that patients have a better prognosis, [14] or somewhat higher, 4.0 ng/ml. [12] These differences may be explained by different study populations and follow-up methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] After androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer, a series of dynamic changes in serum PSA levels occur, and various factors affected by these changes may provide important prognostic information. However, considerable controversy persists regarding the utility of PSA nadir (nPSA) values, time to nadir PSA (TTN), and halving time after androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer in the prognostic determination of prostate cancer, [4][5][6] and need to be analyzed in more clinical studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%