2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2007.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PSA et suivi après traitement du cancer de la prostate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer cells commonly exhibit genomic instability with the telomeres often being shorter than those in normal cells [27,30,31]. Based on the dynamics of the 3D telomere architecture of their CTCs (changes in number of short telomeres over time) at +0, +2, +6, +12, +18 and +24 months, patients were classified into five groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cancer cells commonly exhibit genomic instability with the telomeres often being shorter than those in normal cells [27,30,31]. Based on the dynamics of the 3D telomere architecture of their CTCs (changes in number of short telomeres over time) at +0, +2, +6, +12, +18 and +24 months, patients were classified into five groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are comparing different PSA end points as early surrogates for tumor response, such as six-months PSA end levels after ADT, six-month PSA end levels after RT, and twelve-months PSA end levels after completed ADT (+36 months). The cutoff values were chosen on the basis of previous reports in which PSA end levels above or equal to 0.1 ng/mL after radiotherapy and long-course androgen deprivation therapy are associated with an increased risk of recurrence [6,25,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the Se of Ch-PET/CT is significantly higher in patients with a PSAvel higher than 2 ng/mL/year or a PSAdt lower than 6 months [54]. The proposed PSAvel cut-off of 2 ng/mL/year seems to be the more reliable value to distinguish patients with a positive Ch-PET/CT examination from those with a negative scan in a more accurate way, even if there are some authors who suggest that patients with a PSAvel higher than 1 ng/mL/year could benefit by a Ch-PET/CT scan [55].…”
Section: Hybrid Imaging: Pet/ctmentioning
confidence: 99%