1989
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(89)90040-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prüfer v-multiplication domains and the ring R[X]Nv

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
116
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
116
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…G. Kang proved that R is a PvMD if and only if R X is a Prüfer (indeed a Bezout) domain [30,Theorem 3.7]. In addition, there is a lattice isomorphism between the lattice of t-ideals of R and the lattice of ideals of R X [30,Theorem 3.4].…”
Section: T##-property and T-radical Trace Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…G. Kang proved that R is a PvMD if and only if R X is a Prüfer (indeed a Bezout) domain [30,Theorem 3.7]. In addition, there is a lattice isomorphism between the lattice of t-ideals of R and the lattice of ideals of R X [30,Theorem 3.4].…”
Section: T##-property and T-radical Trace Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact each Noetherian domain has the t##-property An integral domain R is an almost Krull domain if R M is a rank-one discrete valuation domain for each t-maximal ideal M of R. Almost Krull domains were studied by Kang under the name of t-almost Dedekind domains in [30,Section IV]. A Krull domain is an almost Krull domain with t-finite character.…”
Section: Theorem 112 Let R Be a Pvmd And Consider The Following Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important generalization of the Prüfer domain notion is that of a Prüfer v-multiplication domain (PVMD). This notion comes from multiplicative ideal theory, and various ideal-theoretic properties of it have been considered by many authors, see for example [1,2,4,7,9,10,13,14,15]. From the homological algebra point of view, Prüfer domains are exactly the integral domains of weak global dimension at most one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Note: We do assume for both of these results that we know how to construct the Nagata ring R(X) for a quasilocal domain R; in this situation, the condition "c(g) is invertible" becomes "c(g) is principal", [14 Both the Kronecker function ring and the Nagata ring have been generalized and intensively studied (cf. for instance [22], [3], [4], [1], [19], [27], [9], [11] and [17]). However, in spite of their common origin, they have been studied separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%