2003
DOI: 10.1142/s0219498803000349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prüfer ⋆-Multiplication Domains and Semistar Operations

Abstract: Starting from the notion of semistar operation, introduced in 1994 by Okabe and Matsuda [49], which generalizes the classical concept of star operation (cf. Gilmer's book [27]) and, hence, the related classical theory of ideal systems based on the works by W. Krull, E. Noether, H. Prüfer, P. Lorenzen and P. Jaffard (cf. Halter-Koch's book [32]), in this paper we outline a general approach to the theory of Prüfer ⋆-multiplication domains (or P⋆MDs), where ⋆ is a semistar operation. This approach leads to relax… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[21], [9]). In Section 2 we recall the main definitions and we collect some background results on semistar operations.…”
Section: ]: a Domain D Is A Prüfer Domain If And Only If Each Overrinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[21], [9]). In Section 2 we recall the main definitions and we collect some background results on semistar operations.…”
Section: ]: a Domain D Is A Prüfer Domain If And Only If Each Overrinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we mentioned in the introduction, in [5], M. Fontana, P. Jara, and E. Santos have introduced the notion of a P MD to generalize the concepts of Prüfer domains, PvMD's and -multiplication domains to the context of semistar operations.…”
Section: Qp Md's and The Descent Of The P MD Propertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the introduction of semistar operations by Okabe and Matsuda [14], Fontana, Jara and Santos [5] have defined Prüfer semistar multiplication domains (P MD's), as a further generalization to the semistar context of these concepts. To define P MD's they used a notion of -invertibility analogous to the one already used for star operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since D itself is a * -monolocality (by (8)), then ∧ L is the identity function. However, the proof of (8) above demonstrates that * f (= (∧ L ′ ) f by Proposition 7.3 (4)) is not the identity.…”
Section: Constructions and Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%