2005
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m411314200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PrPSc Incorporation to Cells Requires Endogenous Glycosaminoglycan Expression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
77
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The enzymatic removal of cell surface heparan sulphates [58], the inhibition of their sulphation by chlorate [58] or competition with heparan mimetics [58,126] all prevented the binding and the uptake of detergent-extracted, aggregated forms of abnormal PrP in N2a, GT1, and CHO cells. A similar observation was reported for PrP Sc from brain homogenate in CHO cells [55]. Finally, Paquet et al demonstrated an efficient entry of abnormal PrP in permissive Rov cells by mechanisms that apparently did not rely on cellular heparan sulphates [98].…”
Section: De Novo Infection and Cell-to-cell Dissemination Of Prionssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The enzymatic removal of cell surface heparan sulphates [58], the inhibition of their sulphation by chlorate [58] or competition with heparan mimetics [58,126] all prevented the binding and the uptake of detergent-extracted, aggregated forms of abnormal PrP in N2a, GT1, and CHO cells. A similar observation was reported for PrP Sc from brain homogenate in CHO cells [55]. Finally, Paquet et al demonstrated an efficient entry of abnormal PrP in permissive Rov cells by mechanisms that apparently did not rely on cellular heparan sulphates [98].…”
Section: De Novo Infection and Cell-to-cell Dissemination Of Prionssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Other studies used infected brain tissues homogenised in physiological buffers, arguing that PK-digested, highly aggregated forms have poor biological relevance. Despite varying experimental conditions which may hinder comparisons among them, all of these studies have shown that PrP Sc is internalised by a process that does not require the presence of PrP C at the cell surface [55,81,98]. The identification of putative cellular receptors for PrP Sc led to a different outcome.…”
Section: De Novo Infection and Cell-to-cell Dissemination Of Prionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro, GAG facilitates the conversion of PrP C to PrP Sc (35). Cell surface GAG is a ''receptor'' for PrP Sc (32,33). were approximately four times higher than in Tg(PG14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several lines of in vitro and in vivo evidences suggest that binding of PrP to GAG is important in the conversion process, and thus critical for pathogenesis (30)(31)(32)(33). PrP Sc in vivo contains GAG (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In epithelial cells, PrP-res appears to be cotransported with ferritin by a receptor-or transporter-mediated pathway (Mishra et al, 2004). Other recent work shows that heparan sulfate molecules are in-volved but not always essential for PrP-res uptake by several cell types (Hijazi et al, 2005;Horonchik et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%