2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-003-0108-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROZA and CALIBRATION CURVES for Quantitative X-Ray Microanalysis of Biological Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the analysis is limited by the fact that many constituents of particles (e.g., nitrogen, sulfur) also occur within the plant, and the source cannot be distinguished by EDX. Problems may also arise from the topography of rough surfaces and the mass and absorption effect, which lead to erroneous (increased and decreased) x-ray emissions of particles compared to flat standards (Roomans 1988, Goldstein et al 1992, Tylko et al 2004, Hunsche and Noga 2008.…”
Section: Particles On the Leaf Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the analysis is limited by the fact that many constituents of particles (e.g., nitrogen, sulfur) also occur within the plant, and the source cannot be distinguished by EDX. Problems may also arise from the topography of rough surfaces and the mass and absorption effect, which lead to erroneous (increased and decreased) x-ray emissions of particles compared to flat standards (Roomans 1988, Goldstein et al 1992, Tylko et al 2004, Hunsche and Noga 2008.…”
Section: Particles On the Leaf Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of counts per second stored by the detector was about 2,000. Quantitative analysis was performed on the basis of calibration curves prepared with 20% gelatin matrix and known element concentrations [22].…”
Section: X-ray Microanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This eliminated all measurements where any topography and/or mass effects could influence X-ray generation and emission. Element concentrations expressed as weight fraction were finally calculated on the basis of gelatin standards for the spores (Tylko et al, 2004), apatite, anhydrite, kaersutite, and obsidian (SPI 1 Supplies, West Chester, USA) for lime nodes, and external and internal sides of the peridium. Because of similarities of standards to investigated material, net intensities of characteristic X-rays were determined on the basis of top-hat filtering method (McCarthy, 1980), and compared directly to net intensities of elements from the standards.…”
Section: Electron Probe Microanalysismentioning
confidence: 99%