2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3192037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximodistal Organization of the CA2 Hippocampal Area

Abstract: Highlights d The CA2 region is organized around the limit of the mossy fibers d Heterogeneous pyramidal cell types populate the proximal and distal CA2 region d Responses to intra-and extra-hippocampal inputs segregate along this axis d CA2 oscillatory activity and spatial coding change proximodistally

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this idea, DGC recruitment of FFI in CA3/CA2 is randomly wired so as to provide blanket inhibition and govern network excitability in CA3 and CA2, rather than couple individual DGC-dependent excitation with inhibition onto distinct populations of pyramidal neurons (Neubrandt et al, 2017). Loss of PV IN mediated inhibition may disrupt neuronal ensembles and network oscillations by impairing neuronal spiking, recurrent excitation in CA3 networks (Sadeh and Clopath, 2021), reciprocal inhibition between CA3 and CA2 (Boehringer et al, 2017;Fernandez-Lamo et al, 2019;Lehr et al, 2021;Middleton and McHugh, 2020;Nasrallah et al, 2019;Stober et al, 2020) and/or the balance between subcortical and entorhinal inputs to CA3/CA2 during encoding of social stimuli (Chen et al, 2020;Lopez-Rojas et al, 2022;Robert et al, 2021;Wu et al, 2021). Future studies will edify how PV inhibition of CA3/CA2 facilitates encoding of social stimuli in CA3 and CA2 neuronal ensembles and network oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Consistent with this idea, DGC recruitment of FFI in CA3/CA2 is randomly wired so as to provide blanket inhibition and govern network excitability in CA3 and CA2, rather than couple individual DGC-dependent excitation with inhibition onto distinct populations of pyramidal neurons (Neubrandt et al, 2017). Loss of PV IN mediated inhibition may disrupt neuronal ensembles and network oscillations by impairing neuronal spiking, recurrent excitation in CA3 networks (Sadeh and Clopath, 2021), reciprocal inhibition between CA3 and CA2 (Boehringer et al, 2017;Fernandez-Lamo et al, 2019;Lehr et al, 2021;Middleton and McHugh, 2020;Nasrallah et al, 2019;Stober et al, 2020) and/or the balance between subcortical and entorhinal inputs to CA3/CA2 during encoding of social stimuli (Chen et al, 2020;Lopez-Rojas et al, 2022;Robert et al, 2021;Wu et al, 2021). Future studies will edify how PV inhibition of CA3/CA2 facilitates encoding of social stimuli in CA3 and CA2 neuronal ensembles and network oscillations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, the CA2b/CA3a border was drawn at the approximate halfway point of the intermingled region, so as to balance the exclusion of CA2b neurons against the inclusion of CA3a neurons. Considering recent evidence for proximodistal heterogeneity within the CA2 region (Fernandez-lamo et al, 2019; Okamoto & Ikegaya, 2018), and our own observations of greater resilience to neurodegeneration in distal CA2, the CA2 subfield was divided into two equal halves designated as CA2a (distal, near CA1) and CA2b (proximal, near CA3). Such a subdivision of the CA2 subfield has been proposed as a means to take into account the anatomical distinctions between the proximal and distal ends of CA2, considering that neurons in the latter region do not colocalize with the DG mossy fibers (Dudek, Alexander, & Farris, 2016; Fernandez-lamo et al, 2019; Okamoto & Ikegaya, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While such a detailed characterization is still missing for CA2, several studies have analyzed the broad gamma modulation of CA2 firing. CA2 pyramidal cells display phase locking to a wide range of frequencies in the gamma band (Alexander et al, 2018; Fernandez‐Lamo et al, 2019), and CA2 silencing for long periods of time preferentially affects the low gamma band component in CA1 (Alexander et al, 2018). Interestingly, theta modulation strength increases across CA1 towards the border with CA2, while gamma modulation displays an opposite trend (Fernandez‐Lamo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Theta Gamma and Neuromodulatory Control Of Ca2 Network Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%