2020
DOI: 10.1093/condor/duaa012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity to oil wells in North Dakota does not impact nest success of ducks but lowers nest densities

Abstract: Over the past decade, the United States has seen a rapid increase in oil and gas extraction from areas where resources were previously thought to be unrecoverable, particularly the Bakken shale formation in North Dakota. The Bakken overlaps with the Prairie Pothole Region, the most critical habitat in North America for breeding ducks, where oil and gas extraction through hydraulic fracturing has the potential to impact more than a million duck pairs in the United States alone. Here, we evaluated the effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, upland nesting ducks in Quebec's boreal forest showed no change in abundance in association with clear cuts (Lemelin et al, 2007 ). In North Dakota's Bakken formation, nest survival was driven mostly by grassland cover and there was no effect detected from oil and gas development (Skaggs et al, 2020 ). While other evidence from North Dakota suggests a small negative effect of oil and gas development on brood abundance; however, the effect was only evident for a small percentage of the population (Kemink et al, 2019 ) and there was no evidence for pair avoidance during settling (Loesch et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, upland nesting ducks in Quebec's boreal forest showed no change in abundance in association with clear cuts (Lemelin et al, 2007 ). In North Dakota's Bakken formation, nest survival was driven mostly by grassland cover and there was no effect detected from oil and gas development (Skaggs et al, 2020 ). While other evidence from North Dakota suggests a small negative effect of oil and gas development on brood abundance; however, the effect was only evident for a small percentage of the population (Kemink et al, 2019 ) and there was no evidence for pair avoidance during settling (Loesch et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used nest monitoring data from several cooperators, from published and unpublished works collected from 2002–2018, to compare models explaining variation in nest survival: Fisk (2010), Pieron and Rohwer (2010), Docken (2011), Grant and Shaffer (2012), Buxton (2013), Solem (2013), Haffele et al (2013), Skone et al (2015), Borgo and Conover (2016), Martorelli (2017), Sherfy et al (2018 a , b ), and Skaggs et al (2020). Nest searching, marking, and monitoring procedures varied by project and cooperator but generally followed methods described by Klett et al (1986).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual efforts to broadly characterize the distribution of breeding pairs across the PPR (Reynolds et al 2006, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2018) and intermittent attempts to characterize nest survival (Greenwood et al 1995, Stephens et al 2005, Skone et al 2016, Ringelman et al 2018, Skaggs et al 2020), largely drive conservation strategies in the region. Although metrics like nest survival rates provide useful indices for evaluating management actions (Pieron and Rohwer 2010), potentially low rates of post‐hatch duckling survival (Stafford and Pearse 2007) limit the utility of nesting studies for estimating waterfowl production (Amundson et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%