2012
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2011.640706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity-to-goal as a constraint on patterns of behaviour in attacker–defender dyads in team games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
1
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
63
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in football, 1v1 attacker-defender dyads, located at different locations on the field of play (by manipulating distance to the goal area) were found to constrain how attacking and defending players interacted with each other (Headrick et al, 2012). Providing contextual information through vignettes engaged the players in the task by specifying goals or objectives that simulated typical game situations for each field position.…”
Section: Emotions Are Embedded In Situation-specific Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in football, 1v1 attacker-defender dyads, located at different locations on the field of play (by manipulating distance to the goal area) were found to constrain how attacking and defending players interacted with each other (Headrick et al, 2012). Providing contextual information through vignettes engaged the players in the task by specifying goals or objectives that simulated typical game situations for each field position.…”
Section: Emotions Are Embedded In Situation-specific Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current state-of-the-art, only a few papers have analysed the variability of displacement of football players [13][14][15]. All these studies focused on the variability within each sub-phase (e.g., 1 vs. 1 player, 2 vs. 2 players) without considering the full match dynamics (e.g., 11-a-side game).…”
Section: Variability Analysis In Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these studies focused on the variability within each sub-phase (e.g., 1 vs. 1 player, 2 vs. 2 players) without considering the full match dynamics (e.g., 11-a-side game). Generally, studies around sub-phases have presented the variability in the emergent behaviours by means of different player strategies, so as to achieve the final result [15]. Despite their importance towards an understanding of the player's decision-making processes, the variability can be associated with other important indicators.…”
Section: Variability Analysis In Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In dynamic situations, where on-going behaviour has to be continuously modified, action possibilities arise and vanish as a result of changing action capabilities and environmental demands. Because of the dynamic character of situations like these, and the according emergent nature of decisions, this approach has also been referred to as the ecological dynamics approach [98,[100][101][102].…”
Section: An Alternative Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%