1996
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199608000-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity of Iliosacral Screws to Neurovascular Structures After Internal Fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
88
0
10

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
88
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…All infections occurred during the first 4 weeks postoperatively in patients who required long-term invasive ventilation. The risk of neurologic injury after positioning of sacroiliac screws has been reported between less than 1% and as much as 8% [12,36], and in a study of 101 patients using either ORIF with plate osteosynthesis or iliosacral screws, one L5 nerve root lesion occurred [22]. We identified no case of neurovascular damage in our 62 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…All infections occurred during the first 4 weeks postoperatively in patients who required long-term invasive ventilation. The risk of neurologic injury after positioning of sacroiliac screws has been reported between less than 1% and as much as 8% [12,36], and in a study of 101 patients using either ORIF with plate osteosynthesis or iliosacral screws, one L5 nerve root lesion occurred [22]. We identified no case of neurovascular damage in our 62 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…This is due not only to the high anatomical variability of the sacrum, but-in obese patients, in particular-fluoroscopic guidance is difficult and associated with a high risk of sacral nerve damage. Malpositioning of the screw by as little as 4°can cause damage to neurovascular structures [23], which is reported to be as high as 7.7% [7]. Although the incidence of malpositioned SI screws may be reduced by navigated screw insertion, this technique is still associated with misplaced screws in 1.8% of cases [9,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ebraheim et al [9] suggested placement of one screw through the S1 pedicle into the vertebral body is safer, whereas others recommended placement of two screws [5,8,28]. In our treatment algorithm, we used only one screw in all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screw malposition rates with fluoroscopic guidance have been reported to range from 2% to 15% [13,28], with an incidence of neurologic injury between 0.5% and 7.7% [32]. Malposition of the screw by as little as 4°can cause damage to neurovascular structures [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%