2018
DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity-Induced Site-Specific Antibody Conjugation

Abstract: Site-specific antibody conjugates with a well-defined structure and superb therapeutic index are of great interest for basic research, disease diagnostics, and therapy. Here, we develop a novel proximity-induced antibody conjugation strategy enabling site-specific covalent bond formation between functional moieties and native antibodies without antibody engineering or additional UV/chemical treatment. A high conjugation efficiency and specificity was achieved with IgGs from different species and subclasses. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13] In parallel, site-selective chemical strategies for the conjugation of native and natural proteins have also flourishedo ver the past few years, giving rise to methods targeting varioust ypes of amino acids (for example, lysine, cysteine, tryptophan, tyrosine) that proved to be effective on proteins of all sizes, including antibodies. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] With the aim of pursuing the efforts in this field, we could not help but notice that the vast majority of previously reported strategies for the site-selective conjugation of native proteins were focusedo nt he modificationo faunique residue. We hypothesized that targeting two different amino acid side chainss imultaneously would lower the enormouss ubset of possibilities given by single-residue bioconjugation techniques, thus increasing our chances of developing as ite-selective method by minimising the number of potentially reactive sites;apath that has also been successfully explored by others in the meantime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] In parallel, site-selective chemical strategies for the conjugation of native and natural proteins have also flourishedo ver the past few years, giving rise to methods targeting varioust ypes of amino acids (for example, lysine, cysteine, tryptophan, tyrosine) that proved to be effective on proteins of all sizes, including antibodies. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] With the aim of pursuing the efforts in this field, we could not help but notice that the vast majority of previously reported strategies for the site-selective conjugation of native proteins were focusedo nt he modificationo faunique residue. We hypothesized that targeting two different amino acid side chainss imultaneously would lower the enormouss ubset of possibilities given by single-residue bioconjugation techniques, thus increasing our chances of developing as ite-selective method by minimising the number of potentially reactive sites;apath that has also been successfully explored by others in the meantime.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the lack of chemical selectivity of this method can result in nonspecific crosslinking, and 30–60 min exposure to UV irradiation has been shown to cause protein damage . To avoid the use of UV irradiation, Yu et al . and Kishimoto et al .…”
Section: Affinity Peptide Labeling For Site‐specific Conjugation Of Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Furman et al [39] and Xuan et al [40] presented other reactive groups for the same purpose. All of them require the site-specific introduction of artificial amino acids [41,42], e.g., by tRNA-synthetases. This limits the applicability to genetically modified proteins [43] and may be the reason for their lack of practical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%