2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.184517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity effect model of ultranarrow NbN strips

Abstract: We show that narrow superconducting strips in superconducting (S) and normal (N) states are universally described by the model presenting them as lateral NSN proximity systems in which the superconducting central band is sandwiched between damaged edge-bands with suppressed superconductivity. The width of the superconducting band was experimentally determined from the value of magnetic field at which the band transits from the Meissner state to the static vortex state. Systematic experimental study of 4.9 nm t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to test the robustness of the J c (0, B)/J c (π, B) ratio, we consider several cases of holes (no random pinning) at T = 4.5 K and B = 115 mT with rounded corners, where a corner diameter, D, is varied from 0 to 200 nm, in steps of 25 nm. Although D estimated from scanning electron microscopy inspection does not exceed 20 nm, an effective rounding of the vertices could result from a border dead layer, as discussed in [38]. The corresponding J c (0, B)/J c (π, B) ratio presented in Fig.…”
Section: A Time-dependent Ginzburg-landau Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In order to test the robustness of the J c (0, B)/J c (π, B) ratio, we consider several cases of holes (no random pinning) at T = 4.5 K and B = 115 mT with rounded corners, where a corner diameter, D, is varied from 0 to 200 nm, in steps of 25 nm. Although D estimated from scanning electron microscopy inspection does not exceed 20 nm, an effective rounding of the vertices could result from a border dead layer, as discussed in [38]. The corresponding J c (0, B)/J c (π, B) ratio presented in Fig.…”
Section: A Time-dependent Ginzburg-landau Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Physical phenomena, which cause this deviation and variations of the slope, are out of the scope of the present work. They will be considered in details elsewhere [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The etching process can also lead to a reduction in T c due to the appearance of a non-superconducting layer on top, bottom and also on the sides. [46][47][48] However the thickness of such a layer 49,50 is estimated to be ∼ 2 nm only, which leaves a large and effective superconducting channel at the core of the WLs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%