1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf03161863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity effect in superconductor/ferromagnet layered system: Influence of superconductivity on magnetic properties of Nb/Fe epitaxial bilayers

Abstract: Magnetic and superconducting properties of Fe/Nb epitaxial bilayers have been studied. Single crystal Fe/Nb (110) bilayers with a Nb thickness dNb in the range from 250 to 650 A and with a Fe thickness dFe in the range from 7 to 27 A were prepared using molecular beam epitaxy techniques. Magnetization measurements showed the existence of a magnetically "dead" Fe-interface layer with a thickness dNM varying strongly with minor modifications of the growth conditions. For bilayers with a small magnetic layer thic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anomalous IPE presented in this paper can be observed by ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements 72,73 , by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements 68 , and by polar Kerr effect measurements 69 . In these experiments the conventional IPE has been observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anomalous IPE presented in this paper can be observed by ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) measurements 72,73 , by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements 68 , and by polar Kerr effect measurements 69 . In these experiments the conventional IPE has been observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The IPE in conventional SC structures has been observed by several experimental techniques, e.g. ferromagnetic resonance 72,73 , nuclear magnetic resonance 68 , and polar Kerr effect 69 . How anisotropic pairing in USCs affects the IPE, in contrast, has not been discussed so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Yet, studies of transition metal layers in direct contact to elementary superconductors did not show indications for topological superconductivity and dispersing Majorana edge modes. 15 For such lattices in direct contact to the superconductor, the realization of a SC state in the ferromagnet by the proximity effect [26][27][28] can be hampered by a strong inverse proximity effect, which may reduce the magnetism 29,30 and might also quench the superconductivity in the vicinity of the Shiba-lattice (see citations in 28 ). Another important issue for the development of 2D topological superconductivity is disorder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, studies of transition metal layers in direct contact with elementary superconductors did not show indications for topological superconductivity and dispersing MMs . For such lattices in direct contact with the superconductor, the realization of a superconducting state in the ferromagnet by the proximity effect can be hampered by a strong inverse proximity effect, which may reduce the magnetism , and might also quench the superconductivity in the vicinity of the Shiba lattice (see citations in ref ). Another important issue for the development of 2D topological superconductivity is disorder.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%