1999
DOI: 10.1116/1.591084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity effect correction by the GHOST method using a scattering stencil mask

Abstract: Proximity effect correction (PEC) by the SCALPEL GHOST method, using a scattering stencil mask in which mask-scattered electrons are used as a correction beam, is discussed and a new correction dose adjustment method is proposed. We simulate electron scattering in order to trace electron trajectories in the Si membrane and obtain exiting angular distribution by using a Monte Carlo method. We found that the GHOST can be used for a PEC using a Si scattering stencil mask of about 0.3–2 μm thickness under a 100 kV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The shape modification and the ghost method are two strong candidates. 3,8 The shape modification method seems desirable because it does not require additional complexities, once corrected masks are made. Ghost methods that use scattered electrons from nonfeature areas on the mask as the second exposure utilizing an annular beam limiting aperture at the crossover have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shape modification and the ghost method are two strong candidates. 3,8 The shape modification method seems desirable because it does not require additional complexities, once corrected masks are made. Ghost methods that use scattered electrons from nonfeature areas on the mask as the second exposure utilizing an annular beam limiting aperture at the crossover have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the pattern should be written twice decreases the throughput of the process yet it is easier to use because no computations are needed. 33,42 Now that all these issues have been understood, it is necessary to clarify that our system has NPGS software for EBL, which does not have any tools for correction of proximity effect. By 2008, a new software hardware system called Nanomaker was released; this new packet was able to do EBL on SEM based systems but the novel thing was that this system has tools for proximity effect correction.…”
Section: Electron Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%