1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4534(98)00389-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity effect and superconducting transition temperature in superconductor/ferromagnet sandwiches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
155
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
155
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…So, the AFM(c) = AFM(c¢) solutions are equal to (0p) one, defined by (12), and they coincide with AFM(c) solution for the inner S layer of tetralayer (21). Two other solutions AFM(d) = AFM(d¢) = ( ) …”
Section: Tetra-and Penta-layersmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…So, the AFM(c) = AFM(c¢) solutions are equal to (0p) one, defined by (12), and they coincide with AFM(c) solution for the inner S layer of tetralayer (21). Two other solutions AFM(d) = AFM(d¢) = ( ) …”
Section: Tetra-and Penta-layersmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The solution of the boundary value problem [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] has revealed an additional mechanism of nonmonotonic dependence of T c due to modulation of the pair amplitude flux from the S layer to the F layer. This modulation is caused by the change of the FM layer thickness d f .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oscillation of the pairing wave function in the F metal is a reason for the oscillatory S/F proximity effect, mentioned above, yielding a nonmonotonous, oscillating dependence of the superconducting critical temperature c T on the ferromagnetic layer thickness d F [11,12]. The phenomenon is explained by changing the interference conditions periodically between constructive and destructive upon changing the thickness of the ferromagnetic film thickness.…”
Section: Oscillations Of Superconducting T C In S/f Bilayersmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Here, we set  and B k equal to one. The solutions have to satisfy the boundary conditions [11,[33][34][35]…”
Section: The F/s/f Core Structure Of Superconducting Spin Valvementioning
confidence: 99%