1989
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02556.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROXIMITY‐DEPENDENT CROSS‐COMPATIBILITY IN PHLOX

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite differences in these species' flower colors (Levin and Schaal, 1970;Levin, 1985) and limited pollen dispersal distance (Levin and Kerster, 1974;Levin 1981Levin , 1989b, pollen is dispersed to heterospecific stigmas, as evidenced by interspecific pollinator visitation and the existence of hybrids in natural populations (Erbe and Turner, 1962;Levin, 1967Levin, , 1975Ferguson et al, 1999; L. Ruane, personal observation). The formation of hybrids is encouraged by P. cuspidata's and P. drummondii's coinciding flowering intervals (from early March to late May) and their mutual use of lepidopteran pollinators (Erbe and Turner, 1962;Grant and Grant, 1965;Levin, 1967Levin, , 1970Levin, , 1975.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite differences in these species' flower colors (Levin and Schaal, 1970;Levin, 1985) and limited pollen dispersal distance (Levin and Kerster, 1974;Levin 1981Levin , 1989b, pollen is dispersed to heterospecific stigmas, as evidenced by interspecific pollinator visitation and the existence of hybrids in natural populations (Erbe and Turner, 1962;Levin, 1967Levin, , 1975Ferguson et al, 1999; L. Ruane, personal observation). The formation of hybrids is encouraged by P. cuspidata's and P. drummondii's coinciding flowering intervals (from early March to late May) and their mutual use of lepidopteran pollinators (Erbe and Turner, 1962;Grant and Grant, 1965;Levin, 1967Levin, , 1970Levin, , 1975.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even under levels of deposition of conspecific pollen sufficient to ensure full seed set in SC plants, the expression of SI may reduce reproduction if a substantial fraction of the pollen received is incompatible. SI expression may inhibit reproduction within local neighborhoods of structured populations (Levin 1989;Byers and Meagher 1992;Goodell et al 1997). Even after deposition, self pollen may directly interfere with outcross pollen by reducing germination rates or pollen tube growth (Ockendon and Currah 1977;Bertin and Sullivan 1988;Galen et al 1989;Ramsey and Vaughton 2000) or promoting flower abscission or fruit abortion (Becerra and Lloyd 1992;Morse 1994;Vogler and Stephenson 2001).…”
Section: Pollen Limitation Disfavors Self-incompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the history of duplication or polyploidization in C. rapunculoides suggested by allozyme segregation patterns (Vogler and Stephenson 2001) may indicate that partial breakdown of SI in this species merely represents a by-product of the duplication of part of the S-locus. Alternatively, attenuation of SI expression may directly confer selective advantages in this species, which commonly resides in small, isolated populations (Vogler et al 1999), conditions shown to be associated with low cross-compatibility (Levin 1989;Byers and Meagher 1992;Goodell et al 1997). Indeed, the existence of many possible points of control of SI expression (McClure et al 2000;Cruz-García et al 2003) and the demonstrated heritability of age-dependent breakdown in this species (Good-Á vila and Stephenson 2002) suggest that partial SI expression may represent an adaptation and not merely a transient condition.…”
Section: Evolutionary Significance Of Incomplete Self-incompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plants in large populations may receive more compatible pollen than plants in small populations because large populations have greater mating-type diversity (DeMauro 1993). Alternatively, plants with many nearby neighbors may receive a greater proportion of compatible pollen compared to plants with few nearby neighbors because nearest neighbors tend to be mating-incompatible (Levin 1989). Habitat fragmentation is expected to reduce the local abundance both of individuals and of populations, resulting in a correlation of fragmentation measures across scales (Kunin 1997b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%