Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2007
DOI: 10.1145/1321440.1321542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity-based document representation for named entity retrieval

Abstract: One aspect in which retrieving named entities is different from retrieving documents is that the items to be retrieved -persons, locations, organizations -are only indirectly described by documents throughout the collection. Much work has been dedicated to finding references to named entities, in particular to the problems of named entity extraction and disambiguation. However, just as important for retrieval performance is how these snippets of text are combined to build named entity representations.We focus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
100
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Building on either candidate or document models, further refinements to estimating the association of a candidate with the topic of expertise have been explored. For example, instead of capturing the associations at the document level, they may be estimated at the paragraph or snippet level [7,20,24]. Other extensions incorporate additional forms of evidence through the use of priors [14], document structure [33], hierarchical, organizational, and topical context and structure [6,23], and Web data [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building on either candidate or document models, further refinements to estimating the association of a candidate with the topic of expertise have been explored. For example, instead of capturing the associations at the document level, they may be estimated at the paragraph or snippet level [7,20,24]. Other extensions incorporate additional forms of evidence through the use of priors [14], document structure [33], hierarchical, organizational, and topical context and structure [6,23], and Web data [25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a semantic category, named entities (NEs) act as pointers to real world entities such as locations, organizations, people, or events (Petkova & Croft, 2007). Because NEs can provide much richer semantic content than most vocabulary words, they have been studied extensively in various language processing and information access tasks.…”
Section: Named Entities In Information Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another approach, the partial relevance of each query term instance found in a document contributed to the probability of a candidate's expertness, but proportionally to its word distance from the nearest mention of the candidate in this document. Different distance functions have been applied and some of them lead to window-based approaches (Petkova and Croft, 2007).…”
Section: Window-based Expert Findingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While one approach measures the degree of proximity of a term to the query terms in the scope of a document (Gao et al, 2002), the other also takes the sequential order of terms into account (Metzler and Croft, 2007). Once, it was shown for expert finding that the overall pairwise distance between a candidate's mention and the query terms in a document expresses the degree of association between the document and the candidate (Petkova and Croft, 2007). At the same time, the importance of the order in which personal identifiers and query terms occur in documents was never studied to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Using Sequential Dependenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation