1973
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1973.44.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity approach to semi-metric and developable spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 1908 a number of mathematicians, such as Efremovic, Smirnov, Leader,Cech, and others, have developed the theory of proximity spaces (see, e.g., [8,66,30,72,40,69,10,21,12], nicely summarized in [5]). As per the dictum of A. Einstein, "the significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them", problems in topology and analysis can be solved and generalized by the use of proximity that is at a higher level than topology [ [10]. This result was used by Domiaty and Laback in a study of semi-metric spaces in general relativity [7].…”
Section: Frigyes Riesz 1880-1956mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1908 a number of mathematicians, such as Efremovic, Smirnov, Leader,Cech, and others, have developed the theory of proximity spaces (see, e.g., [8,66,30,72,40,69,10,21,12], nicely summarized in [5]). As per the dictum of A. Einstein, "the significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them", problems in topology and analysis can be solved and generalized by the use of proximity that is at a higher level than topology [ [10]. This result was used by Domiaty and Laback in a study of semi-metric spaces in general relativity [7].…”
Section: Frigyes Riesz 1880-1956mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion of nearness between sets (proximity relation between sets) was firstly investigated from a spatial meaning of distance by Efremovic [6]. Later, it would seem that the notion of proximity between sets was more abstract, i.e., proximity not limited to a spatial interpretation (see, also [7,12]). Peters studied near sets in [11], where objects with affinities were considered perceptually near to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, it would seem that the notion of proximity between sets was more abstract, i.e., proximity not limited to a spatial interpretation (see, also [4,29]). This later form of proximity relation permits either a quantitative (spatial) or qualitative (non-spatial) interpretation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%