2017
DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2016.1263387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximity and power in collaborative innovation projects

Abstract: Proximity and power in collaborative innovation projects AbstractThe proximity literature has so far paid little attention to power relations in collaborative innovation projects. This paper draws on contributions from international business to examine if power constellations between collaborators in innovation projects influence the effects of proximity. An analysis of two cases of collaborations between headquarters and subsidiaries of multinational companies highlights that specific power constellations ind… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The most conceivable reason for researchers is its potential benefits. Just as scholars state briefly in their papers, the benefit especially on shared of human resources, new technologies, high-quality facilities, and specialized services agents brought from collaborative innovation activities, have greatly increased their willingness (Docherty et al, 2004;Hansen and Mattes, 2018). Innovation actors such as scientific and technological firms could also be benefited from collaboration innovation activities, and these benefits are mainly coming from those located in the innovation clusters (Marshall, 1920;Amin and Thrift, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most conceivable reason for researchers is its potential benefits. Just as scholars state briefly in their papers, the benefit especially on shared of human resources, new technologies, high-quality facilities, and specialized services agents brought from collaborative innovation activities, have greatly increased their willingness (Docherty et al, 2004;Hansen and Mattes, 2018). Innovation actors such as scientific and technological firms could also be benefited from collaboration innovation activities, and these benefits are mainly coming from those located in the innovation clusters (Marshall, 1920;Amin and Thrift, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet other 'negative sides' to personal proximity were identified in Ooms and Ebbekink (2015). Both studies' findings link to the debate about the effects of proximity on power relations between organizations and individuals in collaborative innovation projects, recently opened by Hansen and Mattes (2018), although said study was related to other proximity dimensions. Considering that power is an attribute that actors derive from the relationship with others (e.g.…”
Section: Research Agenda: Moving Beyond Conceptualization and Exploramentioning
confidence: 71%
“…How do different power relations affect the opportunities and challenges for green industry development in regions (e.g. Hansen & Mattes, 2018;Sotarauta, 2015)? Furthermore, we do not dig into qualitative differences in industrial specializations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%