2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24722-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximate ferromagnetic state in the Kitaev model material α-RuCl3

Abstract: Abstractα-RuCl3 is a major candidate for the realization of the Kitaev quantum spin liquid, but its zigzag antiferromagnetic order at low temperatures indicates deviations from the Kitaev model. We have quantified the spin Hamiltonian of α-RuCl3 by a resonant inelastic x-ray scattering study at the Ru L3 absorption edge. In the paramagnetic state, the quasi-elastic intensity of magnetic excitations has a broad maximum around the zone center without any local maxima at the zigzag magnetic Bragg wavevectors. Thi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, at finite temperatures, the above method should be hard to treat both excitations with distinct energy scales. Thus, we use the TPQ state method [30,31], where local quantities are efficiently evaluated without the trace calculations [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. An important point is that this numerical method takes several energy scales into account on equal footing, and thereby has been successfully used in several systems such as the Heisenberg model on frustrated lattices [30][31][32][43][44][45][46] and the Kitaev models [47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, at finite temperatures, the above method should be hard to treat both excitations with distinct energy scales. Thus, we use the TPQ state method [30,31], where local quantities are efficiently evaluated without the trace calculations [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. An important point is that this numerical method takes several energy scales into account on equal footing, and thereby has been successfully used in several systems such as the Heisenberg model on frustrated lattices [30][31][32][43][44][45][46] and the Kitaev models [47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2 (a), (b), and S3]. The strength of the CEF is typically ∼ 1 eV [80]. If the ligand is ∼ 0.1-1 nm away from the magnetic ion, the internal CEF is ∼ 10-100 MV/cm.…”
Section: S3 Strength Of External and Internal Electric Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 4) guides us to experimental controls of Kitaev materials. Currently, much effort is being made to investigate effects of non-Kitaev interactions on QSL states of the pure Kitaev model because non-Kitaev interactions are present in real Kitaev materials such as α-RuCl 3 [73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To avoid crossing a two-dimensional phase transition on passing to the trivial phase, the bridge thickness should not greatly exceed the bulk spin-liquid correlation length ξ bulk ∼ v bulk /∆ bulk , where v bulk is the Dirac velocity for bulk emergent fermions. For Kitaev couplings K ∼ 8meV [68][69][70][71] and lattice constant a ∼ 0.6nm [72], the velocity is v bulk ≈ √ 3Ka/4 ∼ 3 × 10 3 m/s [2]; taking ∆ bulk ∼ 5K [15] then yields ξ bulk ∼ 5nm. The bridge length L b , however, must exceed ξ bulk so that Ising anyons trapped in the holes decouple in the spin-liquid bridge configuration and thus cannot annihilate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%