2023
DOI: 10.1111/sms.14374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal to distal sequencing impacts on maximum shoulder joint angles and the risk of impingement in baseball pitching involving a scapular independent thoracohumeral model

Abstract: Background: Hyperangulation of the scapulohumeral joint due to poor coordination of the scapula during throwing motion is claimed to be a major cause of internal impingement in baseball pitchers. However, evidence of injurious scapular kinematics is lacking, particularly regarding how hyperangularion actually occurs in full-effort pitching. The purpose of this study was to describe sequential scapular motions involved in attaining maximum joint angles during pitching and the implications for internal impingeme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Rapsodo system (Pitching 2.0, Rapsodo LLC) was used to measure the ball speed of each pitch. Pitching delivery motions were recorded with an electromagnetic tracking device 39 (Liberty, Polhemus, USA) which measured the six degrees of freedom of motion for two sensors attached to the participant’s body at the nominal sampling rate of 240 Hz. A system sensor was attached on the skin over the dorsal surface of the distal 1/5th of the forearm of the dominant side with double-sided tape and elastic tape and another sensor was attached to the upper arm with a plastic cuff that wrapped around the upper arm to minimize the influence of skin artifacts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Rapsodo system (Pitching 2.0, Rapsodo LLC) was used to measure the ball speed of each pitch. Pitching delivery motions were recorded with an electromagnetic tracking device 39 (Liberty, Polhemus, USA) which measured the six degrees of freedom of motion for two sensors attached to the participant’s body at the nominal sampling rate of 240 Hz. A system sensor was attached on the skin over the dorsal surface of the distal 1/5th of the forearm of the dominant side with double-sided tape and elastic tape and another sensor was attached to the upper arm with a plastic cuff that wrapped around the upper arm to minimize the influence of skin artifacts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%