2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal Pole Scaphoid Fractures: A Computed Tomographic Assessment of Outcomes

Abstract: Prognostic IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Grewal et al evaluated union using two methods of evaluating CT scans and later used this method to evaluate different variables effect on healing time. 25,26 We used radiographs and clinical findings such as tenderness over the snuffbox to determine union. Though the same system was used for both groups of Abbreviations: KW, Kirschner wire; SD, standard deviation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grewal et al evaluated union using two methods of evaluating CT scans and later used this method to evaluate different variables effect on healing time. 25,26 We used radiographs and clinical findings such as tenderness over the snuffbox to determine union. Though the same system was used for both groups of Abbreviations: KW, Kirschner wire; SD, standard deviation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Krimmer et al proposed a CT-based classification of scaphoid fractures based on fracture location and stability of the fracture pattern, a specific definition of the boundaries of the proximal pole is not stated; throughout the literature, the proximal pole has ranged from the proximal one-fifth to the proximal one-third of the scaphoid. 3,[22][23][24][25][26] Therefore, for the purpose of this study, a proximal pole scaphoid fracture was defined as the majority of the fracture line located proximal to the head of the capitate. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, pre-and postoperative imaging, and operative reports were reviewed and recorded (►Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of 13 studies analyzed, four were prospective [5,[21][22][23], and six retrospective [18,19,[24][25][26][27], one of which focused on proximal pole fractures [26]. These studies included a total of 1603 acute scaphoid fractures.…”
Section: Scaphoid Fractures In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, three register studies encompassed 35 493 scaphoid fractures [20,28,29]. In the majority of studies, the fracture diagnosis was based on conventional radiographs, while in two studies [21,22] it was based on CT and MRI combined, and one study [26], with focus on proximal pole fractures, CT was used for diagnosis. The most common trauma mechanism included a fall onto an outstretched hand during sports.…”
Section: Scaphoid Fractures In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%