2002
DOI: 10.1080/02331930290019413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal Point Algorithm On Riemannian Manifolds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
185
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
185
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, supposing +∞ k=0 1/λ k = +∞ and that f has a minimizer, the authors proved convergence of the sequence (f (x k )) to the minimum value and convergence of the sequence (x k ) to a minimizer point. With the result of convergence of the sequence generated by the proximal algorithm (1.2) (see Theorem 4.1), from a mathematical point -of -view, our paper generalizes the work of Ferreira and Oliveira [17], using Finslerian distances instead of Riemannian distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, supposing +∞ k=0 1/λ k = +∞ and that f has a minimizer, the authors proved convergence of the sequence (f (x k )) to the minimum value and convergence of the sequence (x k ) to a minimizer point. With the result of convergence of the sequence generated by the proximal algorithm (1.2) (see Theorem 4.1), from a mathematical point -of -view, our paper generalizes the work of Ferreira and Oliveira [17], using Finslerian distances instead of Riemannian distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since inf f > −∞, M is a Hadamard manifold and using similar arguments the case Riemannian, see Ferreira and Oliveira [17], we have that for any r > 0,x ∈ M the function…”
Section: Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This method was originally introduced by Martinet [24] and further developed and studied by Rockafellar [27,28]. The convergence of the generated sequence {x k } has been attracted the attention of many authors for the convex case [11,15,17,18,23,24,27,28]. However, there are not many works for the case where f is not convex, we cite [3,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%