Disorders of the Hand 2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-6554-5_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Injuries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Both soft tissue and bony anatomy play a role in maintaining PIP joint congruity; however, the relative importance of each structure regarding joint congruity and stability is not agreed upon. 10 Giddins and Moulten 11 argue if the bony anatomy is intact or largely intact after a PIP joint injury, osseous joint congruency provides enough early stabilization; however, if the bony anatomy is sufficiently damaged, there will be instability in the joint, typically with malalignment. Caravaggi et al 10 similarly assert that bony congruence is key to PIP joint stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Both soft tissue and bony anatomy play a role in maintaining PIP joint congruity; however, the relative importance of each structure regarding joint congruity and stability is not agreed upon. 10 Giddins and Moulten 11 argue if the bony anatomy is intact or largely intact after a PIP joint injury, osseous joint congruency provides enough early stabilization; however, if the bony anatomy is sufficiently damaged, there will be instability in the joint, typically with malalignment. Caravaggi et al 10 similarly assert that bony congruence is key to PIP joint stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%