1994
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(94)90111-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
85
0
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
85
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean number of radiation exposures was 12 (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The mean time to full weight bearing was 11 (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] weeks. The mean follow-up period was 25 (range, 18-30) months.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mean number of radiation exposures was 12 (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The mean time to full weight bearing was 11 (range, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] weeks. The mean follow-up period was 25 (range, 18-30) months.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Intramedullary fixation is biomechanically superior to extramedullary fixation. 3,10 Functional evaluation showed no significant difference in pain, range of movement, or walking ability, but recovery was significantly earlier in patients with the Gamma nail than the DCS. 26 Good results have been reported in elderly patients after intramedullary fixation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…curvature and on the nail tip in contact with the lateral cortex, thus exposing the femur to intra operative and post operative fractures, even under physiologic loads [18]. Moreover, the high implant stiffness also results in a stress rising effect at the nail tip [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, the principle used is one of relative stability through intra and extramedullary implants, represented by sliding pin plates and intramedullary nails (7)(8)(9)(10)(11) . Among sliding screw systems, the biggest representative is the implant known as the dynamic hip screw (DHS)®, which is considered to be the gold standard (4,5,9) for treatment of these fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%