2011
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(10)00174-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal Contact loss between Implant-Supported Prostheses and Adjacent Natural Teeth: A Clinical Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dental literature indicates high percentages of ICL between implant restorations and adjacent teeth . Mesial surfaces were more affected than the distal surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The dental literature indicates high percentages of ICL between implant restorations and adjacent teeth . Mesial surfaces were more affected than the distal surfaces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Interproximal contact loss (ICL) between fixed implant prostheses and adjacent teeth has been reported . Several researchers have investigated the prevalence of ICL between implant prostheses and adjacent teeth .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification has been designed after critically analyzing many randomized clinical trials, observational and cross‐sectional studies assessing the occurrence of food impaction around implants . Studies have shown that the development of open proximal contact along with faulty morphology of the implant prosthesis (subcategory A) is the most common etiological factor that favors food impaction around implants .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of traumatic occlusion along with supraeruption of teeth adjacent to the ankylosed dental implant also increase the risk of food impaction . Traumatic occlusal forces exaggerate the proximal wear on the tooth surface that indirectly promotes the formation of the open proximal contact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%