Proximal associations among college students’ alcohol use and cyber partner abuse perpetration.

Abstract

Objective: Research and theory support alcohol use as a proximal antecedent to in-person partner abuse (PA). However, event-level research has not examined cyber PA thereby limiting our understanding of whether alcohol use proximally relates to cyber PA. Method: We collected daily data on alcohol use and cyber PA from college students (N = 236; 73.3% women) for 60 consecutive days. Controlling for cyber PA victimization, we evaluated whether college students who consumed more drinks perpetrated more cyber PA (between-person effects), whether cyber PA was more likely to occur on days in which alcohol use was higher than each individual’s average (within-person effect), and whether within- and between-person associations between alcohol use and cyber PA varied by sex. Results: Women were more likely than men to perpetrate cyber PA but there were no sex differences in the association between alcohol use and cyber PA. Multilevel modeling revealed that neither higher average alcohol use, nor drinking more than one usually does on a given day, associated with odds of subsequent cyber PA. Although alcohol use did not associate with odds of subsequent cyber PA, posthoc analyses revealed that odds of cyber PA increased as alcohol use increased, regardless of whether drinking occurred before or after cyber PA. Thus, alcohol use may have been more likely to occur after cyber PA. Conclusions: Results did not support alcohol use as a proximal antecedent to college students’ cyber PA. Future research should investigate of cyber PA as a proximal risk factor for subsequent alcohol use.

Alcohol Use, Discrimination, and Psychological Partner Abuse Among LGBQ+ College Students: Results From a Daily Diary Study

“…Participant data used in the present study were collected as part of a larger daily diary study investigating college students’ alcohol use and PA at a large, public, southeastern university (Brem et al, 2022); this study was not preregistered. Participants within the parent study who identified as LGBQ+ ( N = 41) were examined within the present study.…”

“…Each morning at 6:00 AM, each participant was emailed a link to the 5-minute daily questionnaire. Daily questionnaires asked participants to report about their previous day's behavior, defined for participants as the time they awoke until the time they went to sleep, consistent with prior daily diary work (Brem et al, 2022;Shorey et al, 2014aShorey et al, , 2014b. Participants received two reminder emails each day (i.e., one at 12:00 PM and another at 5:00 PM) if their daily survey was not completed by 12:00 PM or 5:00 PM.…”

“…Participants were not dating each other (i.e., data were collected from individuals and not couples). See (Brem et al, 2022) for details regarding participant characteristics of the larger study. Participants included in the final sample used in the present study were those who met the aforementioned criteria from the parent study and self-identified as LGBQ+.…”