1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf00206568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal and distal stratabound ore deposits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…650 m, the postore volcanics amount to only 30 to 60 m, implying that the Stekenjokk-Levi orebodies occur close to the stratigraphic top of the felsicdominated formation. Strata-bound sulfides show a tendency to occur at one specific zone within the succession (Stanton, 1972;Sangster, 1972), representing a change in composition of the volcanic rocks, a change from volcanism to sedimentation, or simply a pause in volcanism (Walker et al, 1975;Solomon, 1976;Plimer, 1978;Meyer, 1981). This is also the case at Stekenjokk-Levi.…”
Section: Discussion and Working Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…650 m, the postore volcanics amount to only 30 to 60 m, implying that the Stekenjokk-Levi orebodies occur close to the stratigraphic top of the felsicdominated formation. Strata-bound sulfides show a tendency to occur at one specific zone within the succession (Stanton, 1972;Sangster, 1972), representing a change in composition of the volcanic rocks, a change from volcanism to sedimentation, or simply a pause in volcanism (Walker et al, 1975;Solomon, 1976;Plimer, 1978;Meyer, 1981). This is also the case at Stekenjokk-Levi.…”
Section: Discussion and Working Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) (Cathies, 1981;Parry and Hutchinson, 1981). The close connection between stringer ore and massive sulfide layers indicates that ore deposition at Stekenjokk occurred in a proximal situation (Plimer, 1978), the massive ore being deposited directly above or close to the exhalative centers, resulting in most cases in an overlapping pattern for the two ore types. Fumarolic centers on slightly elevated terrain close to the margins of the trough are indicated by stringer zone mineralization only at the western margin of Levi (Fig.…”
Section: The Diameter Of the Alteration Pipe Increases Upwardmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pyrrhotite is often viewed as metamorphic in origin; however, the absence of any clear evidence for higher metamorphic grades in these areas and the fact that these deposits also contain significant pyrite with no clear textural evidence for replacement suggest that the pyrrhotite is not the result of thermal desulfidation. Plimer (1978) proposed that in unmetamorphosed massive sulfide deposits of this type, the presence of pyrrhotite can be attributed to higher temperatures and lower Pi2 of the brines that accumulate in deep basins as, for example, at Sullivan or Outukumpu. If we assume that the pyrrhotite in the Carolina Slate belt is primary, then, adopting Plimer's model, the syndepositional character of the major fold structures is reconfirmed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institut fLir Geologie und Pal~ontologie, Braunschweig, FRG Plimer (1978) has suggested that some of the fundamental differences between stratiform base-metal deposits are a result of i) the original magma type related to the mineralisation, and 2) the proximity of the deposit to the volcanic centre.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rio Tinto and La Zarza deposits in the Iberian pyrite belt are related to a bimodal suite of Carboniferous felsic (keratophyric) and basic (spilitic) volcanics that are not calc-alkaline (Schermerhorn, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%