2004
DOI: 10.1021/bi0497291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proximal and Distal Influences on Ligand Binding Kinetics in Microperoxidase and Heme Model Compounds

Abstract: We use laser flash photolysis and time-resolved Raman spectroscopy of CO-bound heme complexes to study proximal and distal influences on ligand rebinding kinetics. We report kinetics of CO rebinding to microperoxidase (MP) and 2-methylimidazole ligated Fe protoporphyrin IX in the 10 ns to 10 ms time window. We also report CO rebinding kinetics of MP in the 150 fs to 140 ps time window. For dilute, micelle-encapsulated (monodisperse) samples of MP, we do not observe the large amplitude geminate decay at approxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These comparisons are consistent with the general idea that structural flexibility is more advantageous for functional ligand-binding heme proteins than for functional electron-transfer proteins, as indicated in the Introduction. Apart from our finding of variation of the CO rebinding kinetics in differently engineered proteins, it is clear that the protein matrix must be responsible for the fast rebinding, as geminate rebinding to the 5-coordinate heme iron in microperoxidase does not occur at low concentrations (25) (it does in aggregates (25,58)). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These comparisons are consistent with the general idea that structural flexibility is more advantageous for functional ligand-binding heme proteins than for functional electron-transfer proteins, as indicated in the Introduction. Apart from our finding of variation of the CO rebinding kinetics in differently engineered proteins, it is clear that the protein matrix must be responsible for the fast rebinding, as geminate rebinding to the 5-coordinate heme iron in microperoxidase does not occur at low concentrations (25) (it does in aggregates (25,58)). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In a similar way, in wild type and mutant Mb, multiphasic picosecond heme-NO recombination kinetics have proven a sensitive tool for assessing the dynamic, steric, and electrostatic role of the heme environment (16 -22). As mentioned above, in Mb, CO geminate recombination is usually less extensive and takes place on a much longer time scale (23)(24)(25) and in the native protein in a monophasic way ( ϭ ϳ150 ns). To gain insight into the dynamic properties of the hydrophobic heme-binding core of cyt.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The dynamics associated with ligand binding to the heme group has been studied for many years in both native and mutant proteins [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and in heme model compounds. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The binding process for model compounds involves at least two steps: the diffusion of ligand through the surrounding solvent or buffer followed by the bond formation step between the diatomic ligand and the iron. In proteins, the process is complicated by the protein matrix where various entry and exit channels, as well as docking sites and cavities within the protein, lead to a complexity in the overall reaction process that is still not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,41 Model compound kinetic studies have been performed in CTAB under conditions where an imidazole ligand is bound to the heme. 18,23 However, for such compounds, the CO ligand escape rate is much larger than its geminate rebinding rate, so the latter process is difficult or impossible to detect. 23 Moreover, in the absence of an added imidazole ligand, the CTAB encapsulated heme samples again display complex kinetic evolution, probably due to a base elimination mechanism 18,42 (i.e., upon CO photolysis, there is a delayed dissociation of the weak proximal base before CO rebinds).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bound ligand can be further stabilized by electrostatic interactions with surrounding polar amino acid side chains. This E7 gate pathway appears to occur in most if not all animal hemoglobins, with the classic 3-on-3 ␣-helical globin fold and a distal histidine, although experimental verification has only been done rigorously for vertebrate Mbs using time-resolved crystallography (4 -8), site-directed mutagenesis (3,9,11), and time-resolved absorbance and FTIR spectroscopy (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%