Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provisioning ecosystem services supply and demand: The role of landscape management to reinforce supply and promote synergies with other ecosystem services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many up to date innovative ecosystem services methodologies are used during this assessment at different working scales, being the following the principal research lines carried out during the process: 1) Studying conditions & trends of Biodiversity & ecosystem services using indicators, and developing a multifunctionality indicator [16,17]; 2) Mapping ecosystems services at different scales taking into account all natural heritage (biological and geological heritage) [18,19], making special emphasis in mapping cultural ecosystem services [20,21]; 3) Analyzing social preferences (demand) and users' perceptions through participatory processes [22,23,24]; and 4) Developing future scenarios, both qualitative (participatory) [25] and quantitative (modelling) [26,27]. These research lines are interconnected.…”
Section: Organization Structure Working Approach and Methodologies Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many up to date innovative ecosystem services methodologies are used during this assessment at different working scales, being the following the principal research lines carried out during the process: 1) Studying conditions & trends of Biodiversity & ecosystem services using indicators, and developing a multifunctionality indicator [16,17]; 2) Mapping ecosystems services at different scales taking into account all natural heritage (biological and geological heritage) [18,19], making special emphasis in mapping cultural ecosystem services [20,21]; 3) Analyzing social preferences (demand) and users' perceptions through participatory processes [22,23,24]; and 4) Developing future scenarios, both qualitative (participatory) [25] and quantitative (modelling) [26,27]. These research lines are interconnected.…”
Section: Organization Structure Working Approach and Methodologies Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the potential for increasing carbon sequestration in the long-term (>50 years) would be higher and other ES would also be favored, while avoiding the environmental problems the actual plantations cause [113], and consequently, biophysical and economic assessment could be matched. Similarly, the replacement of forestry land with high agrological capacity by the very highly economically valued (sustainable) agriculture would improve landscape multifunctionality, increase self-provisioning, recover natural ecosystems and maintain biodiversity and a diverse flow of ES [125,126], leading to a more balanced biophysical-economical assessment. Likewise, it is fundamental to stress the monetary value of ES provided by coastal systems, which seem not to be sufficiently recognized.…”
Section: Recommendations For Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greatest increase in biocapacity and therefore in provisioning ES supply comes with an increase in arable land, whereas increases in carbon storage and sequestration are seen in the scenario with greatest natural forest recovery. In regions like Biscay with high provisioning ES demand (Palacios-Agundez et al, 2015), selfprovisioning should be strengthened given the objective of increasing sustainability and diminishing the region's dependency on external sources. This becomes especially important if competition for scarce land increases at a global scale (Smith et al, 2013).…”
Section: Response Options Towards a More Sustainable Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results have demonstrated that even if carbon sequestration were to increase, this will not offset Biscay's annual emissions unless the demand side is also managed; the scenario with highest expected carbon sequestration showed a maximum total carbon sequestration of 22,144 tC per year, which is only around 1% of Biscay's current annual emissions (IHOBE, 2010). Similarly, even if there is scope for improvement in self-sufficiency, current food demand cannot be met locally, especially if a diverse flow of local ES is required (Palacios-Agundez et al, 2015). This result shows that in regions like Biscay with high current ES demand, it is important to apply policy measures on the ES supply side, and implement ES demand side measures to find a balance that has an acceptable and equitable ecosystem service footprint (Burkhard et al, 2012).…”
Section: Response Options Towards a More Sustainable Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation