2018
DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2018-0783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provisional standardization of hepcidin assays: creating a traceability chain with a primary reference material, candidate reference method and a commutable secondary reference material

Abstract: Background Hepcidin concentrations measured by various methods differ considerably, complicating interpretation. Here, a previously identified plasma-based candidate secondary reference material (csRM) was modified into a serum-based two-leveled sRM. We validated its functionality to increase the equivalence between methods for international standardization. Methods We applied technical procedures developed by the International Consortium for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Results. The sRM, consisting o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
69
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These values can be used as for any other hepcidin assay worldwide that is standardized using the same secondary RM for calibration. 22 TA B L E 5 Results of linear regression models for hepcidin/ferritin ratio (pmol/µg) adjusted for age and time of blood sampling and stratified by sex 26.8%, with ß -0.057, CI -0.072 to -0.041 (P .000), ß 0.175, CI 0.023-0.326 (P .024), ß 0.432, CI 0.221-0.643 (P .000) for age, sampling time 12-3 PM and sampling time 3-6 PM, respectively. c For females, multivariate linear regression model with log-transformed hepcidin/ferritin ratio as the dependent variable and age (continuous variable) and sampling time as independent variables showed R 2 13.6%, with ß -0.042, CI -0.063 to -0.021 (P .000), ß 0.179, CI 0.026-0.384 (P .087), ß 0.250, CI -0.039-0.539 (P .089) for age, sampling time 12-3 PM and sampling time 3-6 PM, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These values can be used as for any other hepcidin assay worldwide that is standardized using the same secondary RM for calibration. 22 TA B L E 5 Results of linear regression models for hepcidin/ferritin ratio (pmol/µg) adjusted for age and time of blood sampling and stratified by sex 26.8%, with ß -0.057, CI -0.072 to -0.041 (P .000), ß 0.175, CI 0.023-0.326 (P .024), ß 0.432, CI 0.221-0.643 (P .000) for age, sampling time 12-3 PM and sampling time 3-6 PM, respectively. c For females, multivariate linear regression model with log-transformed hepcidin/ferritin ratio as the dependent variable and age (continuous variable) and sampling time as independent variables showed R 2 13.6%, with ß -0.042, CI -0.063 to -0.021 (P .000), ß 0.179, CI 0.026-0.384 (P .087), ß 0.250, CI -0.039-0.539 (P .089) for age, sampling time 12-3 PM and sampling time 3-6 PM, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Our hepcidin assay was recently standardized using a second reference material (RM) that was value assigned by a provisional primary RM. 22 For additional information on the laboratory methods, see the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Age and gender differences in hepcidin concentrations are known. Within the mean age group of our study population, 30-35 years of age, (normal) hepcidin concentrations were reported to be higher on man than woman (36, 38). However reference data available is coming from Europe and no hepcidin reference levels are known for an African population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Worldwide hepcidin concentrations are measured by various methods, which differ considerably in absolute hepcidin concentrations (35). Recently, secondary hepcidin reference material, that has been value assigned by a primary reference material, has become available (36). Standardization in February 2019 of a similar hepcidin assay as we used in 2012/2013 for our study, resulted in (only) 5.4 % increase of hepcidin concentrations (C. Laarakker and D. Swinkels unpublished data) (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%