Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition 2002
DOI: 10.2523/77675-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proving It - A Review of 80 Published Field Studies Demonstrating the Importance of Increased Fracture Conductivity

Abstract: TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435. AbstractMany engineers disregard laboratory reports demonstrating that the pressure losses across proppant samples are substantial. Similarly, it appears that the modeling studies warning of substantial productivity losses due to inadequate fracture conductivity have not been universally convincing.Perhaps many practical frac engineers simply object to the theoretical nature of these arguments, when they quote one of the more influential orators of our time, Shania T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this design parameter tends to be overlooked in shale gas reservoirs. It has been demonstrated that high conductivity fractures are less affected by multiphase flow and may provide benefits in fracturing past condensate blocks (Vincent, 2002). Simulation results also show that low conductivity fractures generate very large pressure drop leading to much less effective fracture networks and lower recovery factor than a high fracture conductivity scenario (Mayerhofer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, this design parameter tends to be overlooked in shale gas reservoirs. It has been demonstrated that high conductivity fractures are less affected by multiphase flow and may provide benefits in fracturing past condensate blocks (Vincent, 2002). Simulation results also show that low conductivity fractures generate very large pressure drop leading to much less effective fracture networks and lower recovery factor than a high fracture conductivity scenario (Mayerhofer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Note that the incremental production achieved with superior frac designs was frequently found to be higher than forecast with PredictK. This is not a unique observation; the benefit of fracture conductivity often provides greater benefit than expected 6 . A portion of this benefit may be due to longer effective lengths achieved when fracture conductivity is increased, as has been reported by Barree 7 , and Scott 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…60T, CER, GHC 11.9 (10 6 Figure 6, the averages were calculated from two to nine wells in each category, and suggest that wells treated with ceramics performed the best. The well count for RCS completions is shown to decline because most of these wells are new and have not been producing for a full year.…”
Section: Effect Of Proppant Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By analogy, frac designs should be altered for coals N20 mD, but this generally has not been the case, to our knowledge. The issue has been discussed by Vincent (2002), including CBM fracs, and this has led to general recommendations for increasing fracture conductivity in high-perm coals:…”
Section: Perm Band 20-100 MD -Cavities or Sis Or High-perm Fracsmentioning
confidence: 99%