2006
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2006.875511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing Real-Time Applications With Graceful Degradation of QoS and Fault Tolerance According to<tex>$(m, k)$</tex>-Firm Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem of providing some guarantee for cycling tasks assuming environments where eventual discards in periodic activations may occur has been addressed by a considerable amount of work [1,9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. In general, these studies attempt to develop scheduling strategies that can offer some guarantee for tasks, considering their tolerance to periodic activation losses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The problem of providing some guarantee for cycling tasks assuming environments where eventual discards in periodic activations may occur has been addressed by a considerable amount of work [1,9,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. In general, these studies attempt to develop scheduling strategies that can offer some guarantee for tasks, considering their tolerance to periodic activation losses.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them propose incremental improvements to the DBP in order to reduce the number of dynamic failures [25,26]; other works propose schedulability tests aiming to guarantee that the tasks accepted in the system will not have any (m,k)-firm constraints violation [1,9,[17][18][19]24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We present a model based on (m,k)-firm model [5][6][7][8] to take into account the congestion of systems workloads in companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%