Objectives: Performance feedback is not always well utilized in healthcare. To more effectively incorporate it, we used a discussion of current feedback systems to explore paramedics' perceived needs regarding feedback and to understand what feedback would improve their performance as healthcare providers.
Methods:We used a qualitative methodology with semistructured interviews of paramedics to explore perceptions and desires for feedback. Interpretive descriptive analysis was performed with continuous recruitment until thematic saturation was achieved. Themes were identified and a coding system was developed by two investigators separately and merged by consensus. The analysis was audited by a third investigator, and a member check was performed.Results: Many different ideas were discussed that were analyzed to develop several major recurrent themes.One such theme was positive perception of feedback by paramedics. Despite the positive perceptions discussed, the shortcomings of current systems were also frequently discussed as were perceived barriers to receiving meaningful feedback. The idea of following up on patients' courses/outcomes also arose frequently during the interviews. In addition, feedback and its interaction with mental health emerged as a theme in terms of its potential for both positive and negative impact. Finally, suggestions about the future were also common with paramedics providing thoughts regarding what future systems could be developed or what changes could be made to provide them with meaningful feedback.
Conclusions:Our findings show how paramedics perceive feedback, but still note how barriers may impair its uptake and how it may affect their mental health. Our participants also made recommendations about what they would want to see in future feedback systems. This information can provide the foundation to improve current feedback systems or structure new ones to allow paramedics to continue to develop themselves as healthcare professionals.P erformance feedback on medical care and outcomes in prehospital care is generally infrequent and inconsistently delivered. 1 Research has also produced unreliable results regarding the value of feedback to health professionals-potentially reflecting the variation in content of feedback, the context of the feedback, and the mode of delivery. [2][3][4][5] This suggests that not all feedback is equal: not all feedback systems achieve their intended end of prompting performance improvement. 6,7 Some may point out systems-level changes (e.g., process improvement), 3 while others may not provide enough meaningful information to