2017
DOI: 10.1111/jspn.12167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing opportunistic immunisations for at‐risk inpatients in a tertiary paediatric hospital

Abstract: Attaining high immunisation coverage rates for children with medical conditions is vital. The Royal Children's Hospital (RCH) Immunisation Service has the opportunity to check each inpatient's immunisation status and provide opportunistic vaccines and/or bring the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) up-to-date. This paper highlights that during admission, one quarter of children were not up-to-date with routine scheduled immunisations and 42% of those inpatients due or overdue for immunisation we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 However, the hospital offers a trustworthy setting for the vaccination of patients with chronic or rare diseases, because it is the reference environment and perceived as being safer. 27 Our study suggests the need to promote correct vaccination timing in a population already at increased risk of infections and complications, to issue recommendations and to dispel incorrect contraindications. 26 The difference in vaccination coverage for the 2nd MMR and varicella doses between hematological and oncological patients can be explained by the fact that both vaccines should be administered between the 5th and 6th year of life; however this is the age at which most oncological pathologies are diagnosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…26 However, the hospital offers a trustworthy setting for the vaccination of patients with chronic or rare diseases, because it is the reference environment and perceived as being safer. 27 Our study suggests the need to promote correct vaccination timing in a population already at increased risk of infections and complications, to issue recommendations and to dispel incorrect contraindications. 26 The difference in vaccination coverage for the 2nd MMR and varicella doses between hematological and oncological patients can be explained by the fact that both vaccines should be administered between the 5th and 6th year of life; however this is the age at which most oncological pathologies are diagnosed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Pappano et al [36], for instance, found higher coverage (57%) among at-risk children who were offered the influenza vaccine in a paediatric emergency department compared to those who were given education on where to obtain the vaccine (36%). Furthermore, while participants in this study were reluctant to vaccinate inpatients, on-ward vaccination programs have been shown to be feasible when there is collaboration with the inpatient clinical team [37]. The provision of influenza immunisation through dedicated vaccination clinics has also been trialled in several Australian hospitals, with a subsequent increase in the number of vaccinations administered [38].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elia et al 9 targeted children with medical conditions in the Royal Children's Hospital in Proportion not up to date…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%