2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing multiple hard latency and throughput guarantees for packet switching networks on chip

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of CAP, such end-to-end connections are used to improve performance and reduce communication overhead on behalf of the application programmer. The proposed NoC realizes a fully decentralized and scalable resource allocation scheme as detailed in [11]. All virtual channels can be either used by Best Effort (BE) communication or GS end-to-end connections.…”
Section: Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of CAP, such end-to-end connections are used to improve performance and reduce communication overhead on behalf of the application programmer. The proposed NoC realizes a fully decentralized and scalable resource allocation scheme as detailed in [11]. All virtual channels can be either used by Best Effort (BE) communication or GS end-to-end connections.…”
Section: Resource Allocationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprises 16 SPARC LEON3 processing elements that are available as part of GRLIB [18], equally distributed over 4 tiles that in turn are connected via a custom-designed network-on-chip [19]. The platform is prototyped on multiple FPGAs (Synopsys CHIPit System [20] consisting of six Xilinx Virtex-5 XC5VLX330 FPGAs) and runs at a frequency of 50 MHz.…”
Section: Evaluation Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a remedy, physical links between adjacent routers in our proposed NoC architecture are arbitrated in a weighted round robin scheme [12] for transmitting the packets of the different messages routed over it. In this arbitration scheme, also an amount of time slots (one slot for transmitting one packet) is periodically available for the overall transmission over a link, and a budget of time slots can be reserved for the transmission of a single message.…”
Section: Timing Analysis On Network-on-chipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in contrast to a global synchronous TDMA, only the amount of time slots and not their positions within one period are fixed. This enables dynamic system management and increases the utilization while still allowing to compute upper bounds for worst-case response times [12].…”
Section: Timing Analysis On Network-on-chipmentioning
confidence: 99%