Providing health services during a civil war: the experience of a garrison town in South Sudan

Abstract

The impact of conflict, particularly conflict arising during civil wars, on the provision of healthcare is a subject that has not been widely considered in conflict-related research. Combatants often target health services to weaken or to defeat the enemy, while attempts to maintain or improve health systems also can comprise part of counter-insurgency 'hearts-and-minds' strategies. This paper describes the dynamics associated with the provision of health services in Malakal, an important garrison town in South Sudan, during the second Sudanese civil war (1983-2005). Drawing on the concepts of opportunity hoarding and exploitation, it explores the social and political dynamics of service provision in and around the town during the war. These concepts provide a useful lens with which to understand better how health services are affected by conflict, while the empirical case study presented in the paper illustrates dynamics that may be repeated in other contexts. The concepts and case study set out in this paper should prove useful to healthcare providers working in conflict zones, including humanitarian aid agencies and their employees, increasing their understanding of the social and political dynamics that they are likely to face during future conflict-related complex emergencies.

Assessing the quality of care in a new nation: South Sudan's first national health facility assessment

“…The preservation of the scarce human resources for health is now paramount. While emergency relief is critical during the current crisis, the government should not abandon its development agenda by turning back the clock to where it was prior to independence (Downie ; Kevlihan ). Under the leadership of a committed MOH, the development of a sector‐wide M&E system has begun using LQAS to complement a routine health management information system in which HFs produce standardised monthly reports on communicable diseases and routine service indicators (Laku et al .…”

A critical review of the strategies towards reducing maternal mortality in a low resource setting: Using South Sudan as a case study

“…Three hundred and three thousand maternal deaths (303,000) were recorded worldwide in 2015; with about 1,500 of the deaths occurring in South Sudan [5] . South Sudan's healthcare system and maternity care have been adversely affected by spiraling violence and intercommunal conflicts [19] . There is strong evidence that reducing maternal mortality partly requires the presence of trained attendants during pregnancy and childbirth [20] .…”

Challenges of Providing Health Care in Complex Emergencies: A Systematic Review

“…In addition, more doctors and health-care providers are leaving the region in times of complex crises, leaving these service centers (such as hospitals) with severe shortages of the workforce due to the migration. 21 Furthermore, due to the fact that promotion programs in times of crisis give their place to immediate responses to the challenges created, the workforce training and performance monitoring system has been severely affected, which can significantly reduce the quality of health care. 19 Another major challenge in providing health care in CEs is inexperienced foreign workforces or the lack of experience international forces to provide health care, such as the crisis of the Republic of the Congo in 1999-2000.…”

“…Challenges related to workforce • Injuries and deaths of existing forces (19) • Emigration (19) • Leaving the service (20,21) • Lack of motivation and reward (19) • Inexperienced international workers (19) • Suspension of training and monitoring programs (19) Challenges related to health-care infrastructure • Demolition of care centers (19) • Lack of equipment and technology (19) • Shortage of medicine and medical supplies (19,20) • Financial problems (19) Challenges related to the service organization • Non-integrated care (19) • Neglect of primary health care (19) • Concentration of care in urban areas (19) • Neglect of chronic diseases (22) • Lack of command and procedural unity among NGOs (23) • Lack of effectiveness analysis for selection of interventions (24) Challenges related to information access • Epidemiological data (23,25) • Available resource data (23,25) 4 S H Seyedin et al…”