Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer A
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2000.832237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing end-to-end statistical delay guarantees with earliest deadline first scheduling and per-hop traffic shaping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors in [2] prove that in a deterministic setting, EDF is the optimal scheduling policy at a single switch. However, the computation complexity of EDF is very high [3], mostly since a search operation is required whenever a new packet arrives at the scheduler (for sorting packets according to their deadlines) [4]. To reduce the computational load of EDF, Liebeherr et al propose Rotating Priority Queue (RPQ) [4].…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors in [2] prove that in a deterministic setting, EDF is the optimal scheduling policy at a single switch. However, the computation complexity of EDF is very high [3], mostly since a search operation is required whenever a new packet arrives at the scheduler (for sorting packets according to their deadlines) [4]. To reduce the computational load of EDF, Liebeherr et al propose Rotating Priority Queue (RPQ) [4].…”
Section: B Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, regular EDF is not directly applicable to our scenario for two reasons: First, when resource utilization is higher than 100% (as in our target scenario), EDF cannot guarantee that some flows will not starve [2]. Second, a per-packet computation of the Delay Budget is computationally not feasible and does not scale [3] [4].…”
Section: Scheduling Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, EDF is a dynamic scheduling algorithm. EDF and its several extensions were proposed to guarantee the end-to-end delay of packets, e.g., EDF with traffic shaper [15]- [17] that can regulate the distorted traffic from the EDF scheduler to deal with the bursty traffic. Unfortunately, using optimal traffic shaper is, in general, infeasible and introduces additional packet delays.…”
Section: A Real-time Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most comparative evaluations of scheduling algorithms investigate only a single link scenario, e.g., [26]. Analytical comparisons between Generalized Processor Sharing (GPS) and Earliest Deadline First (EDF) scheduling over a multi-hop path have been presented for worst-case arrival scenarios [10] and for statistically multiplexed traffic [23], [17]. These works highlight the differences between end-to-end delays with these schedulers, but do not study how the differences evolve as the number of nodes of a network path is increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%