Providing Assurance That Cattle Have a Reasonably Good Life

Walker, Jennifer; Keyserlingk, Marina A. G. von

doi:10.1201/b21911-12

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Increasing consumer influence over livestock production systems means producers need to be aware of societal concerns and address these to maintain social licences to operate [5,6]. As pasture systems are considered gold standard by consumers, the unnatural environment of intensive farming systems, such as feedlots, must be considered by industry [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Exercise Enrichment on Feedlot Cattle Behaviour and the Human–Animal Relationship

Dunston-Clarke

Hunter

Collins

2020

The 1st International Electronic Conference on Animals—Global Sustainability and Animals: Science, Ethics and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Finding practicable and cost-effective enrichment for cattle in feedlots is challenging. While enrichment should not negatively impact productivity, it could assist in improving feedlot sustainability, by addressing societal concern that cattle have restricted, unnatural lives. In a feedlot 250km northeast of Perth, 287 mixedbreed B. taurus cattle were provided with two different exercise treatments (1 = exercised in-pen, 2 = exercised in laneway) and a control pen. Cattle were exercised using low-stress stock handling 2-3 times/week for approximately 20min between days 40-80 of a 120-day feeding program. Body weights, crush temperament and crush exit speeds were collected on days 40 and 80, while behavioural testing was conducted on days 41, 60 and 79 in home pens. Body weight was found to significantly increase for all pens, however, weight gains between treatments did not significantly differ (p < 0.05). However, a smaller and higher range of weight gains were found for exercised pens. The control pen had two animals lose weight, suggesting that while enrichment did not negatively impact productivity, there was a possible positive influence. Cattle exercised in the laneway were found to be less responsive and recovered quickly post exposure to a novel human. Cattle exercised in-pen were less reactive during avoidance, and novel person tests, showing an improved human-animal relationship. This pilot study showed that exercise impacted cattle behaviour and the human-animal relationship, which could assist feedlot sustainability.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%