2003
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4203_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Providing Access for Culturally Diverse Gifted Students: From Deficit to Dynamic Thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
99
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Demographic factors have been consistently linked with gifted program enrollment (Esquivel & Nahari, 2000). In fact, the under-representation of minorities enrolled in gifted programs has been an ongoing concern (Ford & Grantham, 2003). Under-representation has been tied to SES in that children whose parents have lower education (a proxy for lower SES) are less likely to attain high scores on tests of academic achievement (Greenberg, Lengua, Coie, & Pinderhughes, 1999) and cognitive ability (Suzuki & Valencia, 1997).…”
Section: Ses Ethnicity and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Demographic factors have been consistently linked with gifted program enrollment (Esquivel & Nahari, 2000). In fact, the under-representation of minorities enrolled in gifted programs has been an ongoing concern (Ford & Grantham, 2003). Under-representation has been tied to SES in that children whose parents have lower education (a proxy for lower SES) are less likely to attain high scores on tests of academic achievement (Greenberg, Lengua, Coie, & Pinderhughes, 1999) and cognitive ability (Suzuki & Valencia, 1997).…”
Section: Ses Ethnicity and Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the disparities that are evident in gifted program enrollment may be a function of fewer resources being available to children from poor families prior to the entrance into school (Bradley, Corwyn, McAdoo, & Coll, 2001) as well as functions of both environments in early childhood and a bias inherent in the gifted identification process found in the gifted literature (Ford, 1995;Ford & Grantham, 2003). For this very reason it is important to bolster children's skills prior to school entry to address achievement gap issues (Hamre & Pianta, 2005).…”
Section: Does the Relationship Between Children's Social Competence Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consistent body of literature (see also Davis and Andrzejewski 2009) points to the power of teacher expectations in shaping the amount of effort they demand in their classroom: ''In some classrooms, low levels of student and teacher expectations coincide resulting in 'treaties': teachers pass students if they are not disruptive, and students cooperate if teachers demand little effort'' (Lee and Ready 2007, p. 105). We argue that teachers committed to closing economic and ethnic disparities and reducing low achievement and dropout need to rethink deficit views of working with different student populations (Ford and Grantham 2003;Hoy et al 2006). We believe districts planning on implementing SLC/SWS reform need to develop professional learning communities in which they use Lee and Ready's (2007) text as a common reading.…”
Section: Implications For Professional Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undergirding the model is the recognition that overcoming resistance to change and letting go of the familiar is crucial to developing effective experiences that will increase teachers' multicultural competence and efficacy: It will provide teachers with the knowledge, disposi-, tions, and skills to educate culturally different students effectively and equitably. When teachers have the benefit of extensive and longterm multicultural professional development and multicultural teacher-education preparation, they are less likely to embrace cultural-deficit views (Ford & Grantham, 2003;Irvine, 2003;Trent, Kea, & Oh, 2008;Valencia & Sol6razano, 1997), are more confident, and believe they are effective in their instruction of culturally different learners (Gay, 2002;Pang & Sablan, 1998). They reach either levels of cultural precompetence or competence.…”
Section: Figure 2 Levels Of Cultural Competencementioning
confidence: 99%