Provider arrangements for mental health services in ‘The New NHS’

Abstract

Mental health services in England, in common with many other European countries, have been the subject of sustained government attention during the 1990s. Since the election of the Labour administration in Britain in May 1997, mental health services have been discussed in most Department of Health documents on health and social care policy, and mental health services in England have a new national strategy. At the same time, the local provision of mental health services within NHS Trusts has been undergoing organisational change. This paper sets out the policy context and evidence base for the reorganisation of provider arrangements for mental health services. In addition, the results of a documentary analysis of unpublished reviews of provider arrangements in 10 localities are presented. The review identified three major themes: firstly, the reconfiguration of NHS Trusts is based around Specialist Mental Health Trusts and Community and Mental Health Trusts; secondly, the joint provision of services and/or the integration of services between health and social services is starting to appear and; thirdly, the delegation of responsibility to localities based on Primary Care Group/Social Services boundaries is being discussed. The paper discerns a number of trends and points to the need for further research, in particular into the relationship between organisational arrangements and effective service delivery.

A qualitative study of referral to community mental health teams in the UK: exploring the rhetoric and the reality

“…A key issue for CMHTs, therefore, is how they gate-keep access to their service [12]. Previous studies have suggested that gate-keeping decisions have been largely determined by individual clinicians and teams, rather than through formal strategic control [13]. Wells [14] described how the lack of prescriptive guidelines and under-resourcing at a local level, combined with a professional imperative to demonstrate the meeting of users' needs, was countered by the actions of individual practitioners reshaping users' perceptions of their needs to match available resources.…”

A study of collaboration inpatient treatment between the community psychiatric health services and a psychiatric hospital in Norway

“…2001, Rosenheck et al . 2001); the need for evaluation of different service systems; and the use of goals to reach decisions about whether to use direct or indirect client treatment as a model for improving the service systems; (Badger et al . 2000, Barnes et al .…”

Mergers and Acquisitions in the Private Sector: What Are the Lessons for Health and Social Services?

“…These views echo those of managers in company mergers. Peck and Hills (2000) monitored the emerging provider arrangements for the delivery of mental health services in the NHS during 1998 by reviewing documents relating to the proposed reconfiguration of 11 mental health services in England. They note that none cite any evidence in support of the benefits that are alleged to accrue from the proposed reconfiguration.…”