2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provider ambivalence about using forensic medical evaluation to respond to child abuse: A content and discourse analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent qualitative study, Morris, Rivaux, and Faulkner found that healthcare providers at child advocacy centers noted their concerns for all children they evaluate, not just the cases that go to trial, while emphasizing that the well‐being of the child and family is the top priority of clinicians (26). The study included child abuse pediatricians as well as other healthcare providers (26). This is also reflected in the practice of each child abuse pediatrician at the current study’s location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a recent qualitative study, Morris, Rivaux, and Faulkner found that healthcare providers at child advocacy centers noted their concerns for all children they evaluate, not just the cases that go to trial, while emphasizing that the well‐being of the child and family is the top priority of clinicians (26). The study included child abuse pediatricians as well as other healthcare providers (26). This is also reflected in the practice of each child abuse pediatrician at the current study’s location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasionally, the close proximity of child abuse pediatricians and district attorneys in multidisciplinary teams sparks a perception that a child abuse pediatrician’s primary focus is to only diagnose maltreatment. In a recent qualitative study, Morris, Rivaux, and Faulkner found that healthcare providers at child advocacy centers noted their concerns for all children they evaluate, not just the cases that go to trial, while emphasizing that the well‐being of the child and family is the top priority of clinicians (26). The study included child abuse pediatricians as well as other healthcare providers (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings align with previous research indicating that jurors expect some form of physical evidence in cases of child sexual abuse (Shelton, Kim, & Barak, ). However, health care providers have reported ambivalence about conducting a forensic medical evaluation in response to reported child sexual abuse (Morris, Rivaux, & Faulkner, ), a phenomenon that could negatively impact victim believability and reporting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns have been raised that such examinations contribute to children's and adolescents' distress and emotional trauma (Dubowitz, 1998; Rachamim & Hodes, 2011) and may be traumatising for the child or young person (Guertin et al, 2019). This has resulted in ambivalence to refer children for such examinations (Al‐Jilaihawi et al, 2017; Morris et al, 2017). However, very little contemporary research exists to validate or refute such concerns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%