2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-006-9003-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provide expertise or facilitate ethical reflection? A comment on the debate between Cowley and Crosthwaite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There simply are no quick fixes in the world of ethical decisionmaking. 25 Ethical competence is needed to deal with the problems as they arise. Our upbringing has supplied us with such competence to some degree, but it can be sustained and developed by ethics education and ongoing development of the relevant skills and sensitivities.…”
Section: Discussion: Lessons To Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There simply are no quick fixes in the world of ethical decisionmaking. 25 Ethical competence is needed to deal with the problems as they arise. Our upbringing has supplied us with such competence to some degree, but it can be sustained and developed by ethics education and ongoing development of the relevant skills and sensitivities.…”
Section: Discussion: Lessons To Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, it cannot be claimed that philosophers are moral experts if they cannot claim to be better than ordinary people in exercising judgements about morality. Very similar considerations have also led others to reject or hedge the concept of moral expertise [10]. For example, Cowley argues that in respect of non-abstract moral quandaries like euthanasia, even if moral philosophers have greater familiarity with philosophical theory, they are no better situated than educated laypersons to determine what to do.…”
Section: Misconception 1: Moral Expertise As Absolute Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They, 'like everyone else' are invoking 'second order intuitions to stipulate that one consideration outweighs the other' [6]. Few, it is to be expected, would accept the concept where the effect is to suggest that moral philosophers have 'privileged knowledge on what is morally right' [10]. Yet even the exceptional few who do argue for moral expertise, notably Singer [17] and Gesang [12], neither venture so far as to say that moral philosophers possess 'command knowledge' in the sense of telling people what they must do.…”
Section: Misconception 1: Moral Expertise As Absolute Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations