Sources of Difficulty in the Yound Child's
Understanding of Metaphorical LanguageThree experiments examined children's understanding of metaphorical language.In these experiments, preschool, first grade, and third grade children heard short stories ending with a metaphorical sentence describing an action. They were then asked to act out the stories and the metaphorical sentences using toys in a specially constructed "toy world." Metaphor comprehension was assessed on the basis of the children's enactments. The experiments manipulated the predictability of the story endings given the already established context, and two aspects of the complexity of the metaphorical sentences themselves: the verb of the metaphorical sentence (literal versus nonliteral verb), and the explicitness of its comparative structure (simile versus metaphor). Results showed that both the predictability of the story endings and the complexity of the metaphorical sentences had a marked effect on the difficulty of the metaphor comprehension task. The data were interpreted as supporting the view that the success or failure in comprehending metaphorical language depends on the overall difficulty of the comprehension task, conceptualized in terms of the interactive effects of different difficulty sources, rather than simply on the fact that a linguistic input requires a metaphorical interpretation. The experiments also identified some of the conditions under which even preschool children show evidence of metaphor comprehension, and clarified aspects of the development of metaphoric competence.Existing research reveals conflicting findings about the ability of children to understand metaphorical language. While research directly investigating children's comprehension of metaphor tends to show that metaphor comprehension does not occur until late childhood or early adolescence (Asch & Nerlove, 1960; Billow, 1975;Cometa & Eson, 1978;Winner, Rosenstiel & Gardner, 1976), there is other evidence that even preschool children have some basic metaphoric competence. For example, Gardner (1974) found that given a pair of adjectives (hard/soft) and a pair of sounds, colors, or faces, 3 1/2-year-old children could sometimes match such adjectives with an appropriate sound, color or face. Gentner (1977) also showed that preschool children can perform analogical mappings from the domain of the human body to pictures of mountains or trees as consistently as adults.Further support for the idea that young children have some basic metaphoric competence comes from observations that preschool children are very creative in their use of language, making sophisticated comparisons that involve the ability to see similarity between things that, at a superficial level, seem very dissimilar (Billow, 1981;Carlson & Anisfeld, 1969; Chukovsky, 1968;Gardner, Winner, Bechhofer & Wolf, 1978;Piaget, 1962; Winner, MacCarthy, & Gardner, 1980 (1983) found that by four years of age children are able to distinguish comparisons based on metaphorical similarity from those ba...